Укр|Eng|Рус
Ukraine
Catalog   /   Small Appliances   /   Beauty & Hygiene   /   Electric Toothbrushes

Comparison Oral-B Pro 500 Cross Action vs Oral-B Pro 750 Cross Action

Add to comparison
Oral-B Pro 500 Cross Action
Oral-B Pro 750 Cross Action
Oral-B Pro 500 Cross ActionOral-B Pro 750 Cross Action
Compare prices 27Compare prices 27
User reviews
0
0
0
1
TOP sellers
Typetoothbrushtoothbrush
In box
Number of nozzles1 pcs1 pcs
Nozzles
standard round /Cross Action/
standard round /Cross Action/
Model of the replacement headEB 50EB 50
Specs
Operating modes11
Power modes11
Modes
daily brushing (3D)
daily brushing (3D)
Brushing technology
reciprocating
pulsating
reciprocating
pulsating
Rotating frequency (sweeping)8.8 ths/min8 ths/min
Pulsation frequency20 ths/min20 ths/min
Features
Timer
 /2 min/
Pressure sensor
Head wear indicator
Additionally in a set
charging stand
 
charging stand
box / case
General
Power source
accumulator powered
accumulator powered
Max. operating time40 min
Charging indicator
Color
Added to E-Catalogdecember 2016november 2015

Rotating frequency (sweeping)

The frequency of working movements of a toothbrush with a reciprocating-rotating or reciprocating-brushing brushing technology (see above). In modern models, this figure can be from 4 – 5 to 40K movements per minute.

The higher the speed of the toorhbrush, the faster and more efficiently it handles with its task. On the other hand, high speed and intensity of processing is not always desirable — for example, with sensitive teeth or weak gums, such a brush can create problems. Therefore, you need to choose a device according to the frequency of rotation, taking into account the characteristics of your teeth; Ideally, you should consult with your dentist first. However, modern toothbrushes may have several modes, including gentle (see "Functions").

Additionally in a set

Additional items supplied with the device (in addition to the base and attachment set).

The most popular types of such items nowadays are charging stand, accessory stand, UV sanitizer and case ; Here is a more detailed description of each option:

— Charging stand. A battery charging device designed as a stand serves the dual purpose of recharging the battery and offering added convenience for storing the device. It's worth noting that this function can apply to dental centers, even if they primarily operate on mains power (as indicated in the "Type of power" section). In such cases, the toothbrush included with the dental center typically runs on batteries, and the charging stand is typically integrated directly into the main unit of the dental center for ease of use.

— Stand for accessories. A device designed to hold various accessories, primarily interchangeable nozzles, can come in different designs. For example, in toothbrushes and portable irrigators, this device is often integrated into a charging stand, which includes both a charging socket and open compartments for accessories. In irrigators and fixed-layout dental centers, these compartments are usually built into the main unit or the lid of the water tank. In this case, the compartments are typically covered with lids for hygiene reason...s, making it a more hygienic option. Regardless of the design, having a dedicated stand for accessories enhances the convenience of storing them.

— UV sanitizer. A device that uses ultraviolet (UV) radiation for disinfecting the device, particularly replaceable nozzles, is typically designed as a distinctive container. In some models, this container also serves as a cover or case. The disinfection process effectively eliminates the majority of pathogenic bacteria and viruses, all without the need for additional chemicals and ensuring safety as the radiation remains confined within the container. However, it's important to note that UV disinfection is not effective against regular dirt and debris, so having this function doesn't eliminate the need to clean the nozzle through washing.

— Case / cover. The device comes with a storage and carrying container, which can be either a hard case or a soft cover. Hard cases offer better protection, while soft covers are more compact and can be rolled up when not in use. Regardless, both of these accessories are highly convenient for storage and transportation. They safeguard the contents from dirt and damage, and in many cases, provide space to store additional accessories, reducing the risk of losing them. While you could use makeshift packaging for the same purpose, the provided container is typically more practical.

Max. operating time

This refers to the maximum duration a device can run continuously when powered by a fully charged battery or fresh batteries. It's worth noting that this metric may also apply to models designed for mains power, such as flossing systems that include rechargeable toothbrushes, in which case we're referring to the battery life of these toothbrushes.

It's important to note that device specifications typically indicate the maximum runtime under ideal conditions, often in the most energy-efficient mode of operation (and for models with replaceable batteries, using high-quality batteries). The actual battery life can vary depending on specific usage conditions. However, this parameter still serves as a valuable basis for comparing different models. Generally, differences in the claimed operating time correspond proportionally to the real differences in battery life. For example, if one toothbrush has a stated operating time of 20 minutes and another boasts 40 minutes, in practice, their battery life (under similar conditions) will likely differ by approximately two times.

It's important to consider that, for toothbrushes, this parameter can help estimate the number of brushing sessions you can expect on a single charge. Typically, the recommended daily brushing duration is 2 minutes. So, if a toothbrush has an operating time of 30 minutes, it's sufficient for approximately 15 cleaning sessions (or more realistically, around 14 or 13).
Price graph
Oral-B Pro 500 Cross Action often compared
Oral-B Pro 750 Cross Action often compared