AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3950X BOX (100-100000051WOF)
 |
 |
AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3950X BOX | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Created using the 7nm process technology, the Ryzen 9 Matisse line model, at the time of its official debut in the summer of 2019, took its well-deserved place as the flagship among AMD's desktop processors. The CPU, compatible with mainstream AM4 custom motherboards, is an advanced solution for creating both gaming and workstations ready to interact with resource-intensive applications.
The AMD 3950X BOX processor received 16 cores and, thanks to multithreading support, is capable of processing up to 32 command streams simultaneously. The base clock frequency is 3.5 GHz, and with increasing loads it automatically increases by more than 30% to 4.7 GHz. Additional potential for overclocking leaves the presence of a free multiplier. The performance of the CPU is facilitated by a huge supply of cache memory (64 MB of the third level). The heat dissipation of the model corresponds to the top performance and is equal to 105 watts. The package includes a Wraith Prism cooler for heat dissipation.
Before buying always check characteristics and configuration of product with online store manager
Catalog AMD 2024 - new products, best sales and most actual models AMD.
Buy AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3950X BOX
All prices 10 →AMD Ryzen 9 3950X (100-100000051WOF) | 27 790 ₴ |  | |||
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X (100-100000051WOF) 100-100000051WOF | 25 975 ₴ |  | |||
| 20 107 ₴ |  | ||||
| 30 640 ₴ |  | ||||
| 32 225 ₴ | | ||||
1 2 1 8 |
Good performance, absolutely everywhere and in everything. For the money that it SHOULD cost, it would have no analogues. But.. 1) The marketplace broke the philosophy of this processor, because it was supposed to cost significantly less than 3900x, and at the same time be better (in the right hands), but this did not happen. In fact, they were either the same, or the difference was meaningless. There are very few of these processes, perhaps this somehow influenced ..
2) A lot of inept users who manage to "strangle" the percent, and then go to the comments .. 3) Requires a good memory. Good does not mean the coolest and most expensive. Finding now for sane money a two-rank opera that can in 3600 cl16 is not a problem at all. Everything that is not two-rank in games very noticeably stifles the percentage, because there is a huge L3 cache, you just need to organize the pumping of the processor with data .. Zen cores are quite smart, by themselves 4) Requires a mother with a good feeder. Good does not mean that you need to take an expensive and overclocker uber, just a good one. 5) DISGUSTINGly worked on Crosshair 6 Hero x370, stability was not included in the chat. Moving to the B550-A Rog Strix solved every single problem, the flight was perfect. This applies to the process insofar as, but just for information  Дмитрий Митус: use AMD 3900 OEM more than year |
I took 2070s, asus tuf gaming x570 and ryzen9 3900x for assembly. If I could return the time, I would most likely take intel. I can’t say that the percent is really bad, it’s just that its advantages are rarely used in my tasks. Multithreading is good for rendering, but for modeling and games it gives very little because these processes are usually one or two threaded and simply run into 1 core. I changed the wraith prism box cooler to a noctua because it is quite noisy and in the tests the percentage gave out 95 degrees right from the threshold. It also didn’t work out adequately to overclock the RAM (kit 16x2 corsair vengeance 3000mhz), the maximum that I got was 3200 by 17. Although reviews, articles, a ryzen calculator, etc. showed completely different indicators. As a result, in RAM latency tests, it shows a value of 75ns (in Intel, this value is two times lower). Even if we assume that very bad dies were caught, then for good ones this value would be in the range of 63-65, which is still a lot. -Number of threads
- At the time of purchase was a little cheaper than competitors - Relatively small tdp -High RAM latency, actual factory loc infinite at 1900mhz
-Weak boxed cooler - Comparatively bad for single-threaded tasks nikolai tihres: use AMD 3900X BOX more than year |
First mass-produced 16-core processor
The 3950X processor with 16 cores and 32 threads belongs to the advanced Ryzen 9 Matisse line, in which AMD has embodied its best practices. In addition to the fact that this is one of the most powerful processors on the market, it is also attractive because it runs on a standard AM4 socket, and not expensive TR4, which was used by the previous generation of record-breaking AMD Threadripper "stones".
Long live the king!
The AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is multi-threaded and has a total of 72MB of cache at all levels. The base frequency is 3.5 GHz, the maximum is 4.7 GHz. The TDP level is acceptable for such a giant - 105 watts. In terms of dry performance, it is in many ways superior to the fresh top-end 12-core Core i9-9920X. On the AMD side, there is a more modern process technology, more cores, more cache, support for high-speed memory and almost the same clock speeds. Last but not least, the new architecture has allowed AMD to make the processor omnivorous and almost universally high-performance: it excels in almost any kind of workload, whether it's rendering, audio production or video games. The latter is especially cool, because in games, Intel processors have always been ahead.
Asking price is only $750
Well, and most importantly: the official price for the Core i9-9920X is $1,200, but because of the shortage in stores, they ask for much more for it. In turn, AMD 3950X is priced at $750. It turns out that by the very fact of the release of this processor, AMD has changed the rules of the game in the mass market, saying in plain text that we no longer need to be limited to 4 or 6 cores. Drop a $1,000 processor and motherboard for one of the most powerful gaming PCs ever. It remains to wait for the end of autumn 2019 and the start of official sales.
PS Also pay attention to its younger 12-core brother Ryzen 9 3900X, which is already on store shelves with a price tag of $600.
AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse configurations
| Price for AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3900 OEM | from 8 361 ₴ | 7 offers | |
 | AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3900 PRO OEM | from 8 291 ₴ | 11 offers | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3900X BOX | from 29 148 ₴ | 1 offer | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3900X OEM | from 18 449 ₴ | 9 offers | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3900XT BOX | from 20 723 ₴ | 1 offer | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3950X BOX | from 20 107 ₴ | 10 offers | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3950X OEM | from 24 110 ₴ | 1 offer | |
A very light stone. Specifically, my copy was well downvolted + let me play with the boost. Could work with 3800 memory, but IF let us down, didn’t want to go above 1800, otherwise WHEA bus / interconnect, which could not be overcome. To say that the loss is big will not work, so everything is very worthy. Single-core performance (and performance in games) at the level of 8700K-9900K (keep in mind that 9900K is 500 MHz faster in the cores, and everything immediately becomes clear and understandable. For those who are "in the know", of course)). That and, in principle, this percentage is somewhere between 9900K and 10900. Those who like to write about large delays, open Zen Timings, observe desynchronization in UCLK / MCLK / FCLK, beat ourselves on crooked hands and delete inaccurate comments. A big hello to those who put a peer-to-peer opera to such a process - guys, don’t assemble computers, not yours) Buy it ready somewhere in a foxtrot, don’t torture yourself and others). Also hello to lovers of "water", I'll tell you a secret that almost any medium-low-cost air will cope with this process (I had Dark Rock 4, but something cheaper with similar efficiency is possible. At the same time, my PBO limits were higher than those of 3900s).
The overclocking that on the screenshots was the intermediate results, the final ones, alas, are not at hand now. I gave the system to a friend, it was a pity to sell (As a result, single-threaded performance turned out to be at the level of 3900x, and multi-threaded performance was even better than that. Boost for all cores 4200, stable 4450 per core