Intel Core 2 Duo E8300
 |
 |
Close
Intel Core 2 Duo E8300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Intel 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Intel.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Intel 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Intel.
Why is the new processor faster at the same frequency?The main factors that make new processes faster without increasing clock speeds
How to choose a CPU?How to choose the right CPU for any task, from spreadsheets to modern games and work applications
AccessoriesAll accessories for Intel E8300 →
User reviews 138 | 1 1 25 110 |
Until the price of the new i-series drops to reasonable levels, this model can be considered a very good alternative. But on the other hand, you can look for something with 4 cores for the same money. For example, models from the Q8000 series. And the overclocking potential is quite decent. I use the E7500 model and must say that the performance is quite sufficient for everyday tasks. With good cooling, you can overclock it to more than 5 GHz. Even in this mode, it doesn't heat up much, so the cooler won't be loud. There are no drawbacks as such, except that it's more relevant to look at the Core 2 Quad now.  Ivanoff: use Intel Core 2 Duo few months |
If you have a lower class percentage, then take it without hesitation. The computer has been running for over 4 years now, almost non-stop. The CPU cooler stopped 2 times and the radiator was heating up and there was a smell of burnt dust. The thermal protection was triggered and everything worked out. Overclocking was done to 4 GHz. Of all the new games, not a single one slows down. Not identified. Borland77: use Intel E8400 more than year i recommend it should buy |
I bought this for a new computer at home. I put together a computer mainly for work, but so I could play games from at least 2008-2009. As for the processor, I got the Intel Core 2 Duo E7400. The stock cooler is not bad, there’s not much to say; it’s good enough if you don’t plan on overclocking. However, a week later, I decided to overclock it. I overclocked it to 4200 MHz with a system bus frequency of 1600 MHz. As a result, performance increased by 50 percent. Now, my overclocked processor can easily compete with the Core 2 Duo E8300. Worth getting without a second thought. mid-range processor, decent performance speed, excellent overclocking capabilities haven't found yet in principle Kolja23: use Intel Core 2 Duo few months |
3 out of 138 user review(s) shown
10 more user review(s)
Intel Core 2 Duo configurations
| Price for Intel Core 2 Duo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 | from 273 ₴ | 1 offer | |
| Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 | from 324 ₴ | 1 offer | |
We recommend
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 4 , threads 8 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 3.9 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 4.1 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent
AMD WRX8, 280 W, cores 12 / 16 , threads 24 / 32 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.9 / 4 GHz, TurboBoost 4.3 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent
AMD AM4, 35 / 65 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.2 - 3.8 GHz, TurboBoost 4.6 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent / Radeon Vega 8
Intel LGA 1151 v2, 35 - 95 W, cores 6 , threads 6 threads, process technology 14 nm, 2.2 - 3.7 GHz, TurboBoost 3.7 - 4.6 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 2666 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 630
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.7 GHz, TurboBoost 4.2 GHz, maximum 64 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, Radeon Vega 7
AMD AM4, 35 / 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.4 - 3.9 GHz, TurboBoost 4.2 - 4.6 GHz, maximum - / 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent - Radeon
Intel LGA 1700, 35 - 125 W, cores 10 / 14 , 6P+4E, 6P+8E, threads 16 / 20 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 4800 / 5600 MHz, is absent - UHD Graphics 770
AMD AM5, 65 - 120 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 5 nm, TurboBoost 5 - 5.4 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR5 5200 MHz, Radeon
Intel LGA 1700, 35 - 150 W, cores 24 , 8P+16E, threads 32 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 5600 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 770
Intel LGA 1700, 35 - 125 W, cores 16 , 8P+8E, threads 24 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 5600 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 770
Intel LGA 1151 v2, 35 - 95 W, cores 6 , threads 6 threads, process technology 14 nm, 1.7 - 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 3.3 - 4.3 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 2666 MHz, UHD Graphics 630