Укр|Eng|Рус
Ukraine
Catalog   /   Home & Renovation   /   Bathroom & Taps   /   Bathroom & Shower   /   Shower Systems

Comparison Grohe Euphoria XXL System 310 26075000 vs Grohe Euphoria System 210 27964000

Add to comparison
Grohe Euphoria System 210 27964000
Grohe Euphoria XXL System 310 26075000Grohe Euphoria System 210 27964000
Compare prices 17Compare prices 5
TOP sellers
Typeshower Systemshower System
Top shower (tropical)
Size310 mm210 mm
Shaperound
round /P/N 28368 000/
Water flow15 L/min18 L/min
Tilt angle30 °30 °
Hand shower (shower head)
Size110 mm110 mm
Jet settings
/Rain / Massage / SmartRain/
Water consumption12 L/min
24 L/min /at 3 bar water pressure/
Hose length175 cm175 cm
Tap
Tap typethermostaticthermostatic
Color
Added to E-Catalogfebruary 2017april 2014

Size

The size of the overhead shower head supplied in the set (see "Complete set"). For round watering cans, this paragraph indicates the size, for other shapes - the length (the largest of the two main sizes).

The larger the overhead shower - the more space it covers, the easier it is to "fit entirely" under the jets and the higher the throughput can be (see "Water consumption overhead shower"). On the other hand, the cost of a watering can directly depends on the dimensions. As for specific figures, the size up to 20 cm is relatively small, although such watering cans are very popular due to their availability and low consumption. Models 21 - 25 cm can be classified as medium, 26 - 30 cm - relatively large, and the largest watering cans for the overhead shower have dimensions of more than 30 cm.

Water flow

Water consumption during operation of the upper shower (cf. «Equipment»). Indicates the amount of water passing through the watering can with the tap fully open and the water pressure 3 bar (standard household water pressure).

The higher the bandwidth of the watering can be - the more powerful and intense the shower becomes. On the other hand, high water consumption is undesirable if you want to save water - for example, if you have meters installed or if water is supplied from a boiler with a small volume. In addition, it is worth remembering that the watering can have different settings and features of water supply. So, by selecting the lake with the right parameters, you can get a nice and effective top shower even when low water flow. Actually, a low value in this case is considered to be up to 10 l /min; the average is 10 - 20 l/min, and in the most productive watering can be up to 30 l/min and even more.

Jet settings

The number of jet settings provided in the complete manual or hygienic watering can (see "Complete set"). However, hygienic leukemias are usually made single-mode - this is quite enough considering the application. But in conventional manual waterjets can be several, which allows you to change the characteristics of the jet at the request of the user - for example, instead of the usual thin jets, turn on a hard jet from a single large nozzle or a solid «soft» Flow from water filled with air bubbles. The specific set of settings can be different, it is worth to refine separately. However, in any case, the more options - the wider the choice of the user and the more complicated and more expensive the watering box itself.

Water consumption

The throughput capacity of a manual shower watering agent, in other words, the amount of water it gives out per minute when the faucets are fully open. Since the capacity is not only related to the design of the watering box, but also to the pressure in the water supply, it is customary to specify an average value - at a standard pressure of 3 bar.

The higher this parameter - the more intense the impact on the body can have a shower. At the same time, high water consumption can become a problem when there are water meters or when there are limited supplies - for example, if hot water is supplied by a boiler. Also note that , low throughput can be compensated by certain jet settings.
Price graph
Grohe Euphoria XXL System 310 26075000 often compared
Grohe Euphoria System 210 27964000 often compared