Add to comparison | ![]() | ![]() |
---|---|---|
Hator Pulsar 3 PRO Wireless | Hator Pulsar 3 Ultra 4K Wireless | |
Compare prices 59 | Compare prices 57 | |
User reviews | ||
TOP sellers | ||
Product type | mouse | mouse |
Connection | radio / Bluetooth / wired | radio / Bluetooth / wired |
Bluetooth version | v 5.1 | v 5.1 |
Multi-Device | ![]() | ![]() |
Interface | USB A | USB A |
Cable length | 1.8 m | 1.8 m |
Range | 10 m | 10 m |
Sensor | optical | optical |
Type | for game | for game |
Sensor and control | ||
Sensor | PixArt 3950 | PixArt 3950 |
Sensor resolution | 400 – 30000 DPI | 400 – 30000 DPI |
Max. acceleration | 50 G | 50 G |
Max. polling rate | 1000 Hz (1 ms) | 8000 Hz (0.125 ms) |
Number of buttons | 4 | 4 |
Side buttons | ![]() | ![]() |
DPI-button | ![]() | ![]() |
Switches | opto-mechanical | opto-mechanical |
Switch resource | 100 million clicks | 100 million clicks |
Scroll wheels | 1 | 1 |
Features | ||
Feet material | teflon (PTFE) | teflon (PTFE) |
Programmable buttons | ![]() | ![]() |
Built-in memory | ![]() | ![]() |
Lighting | RGB | RGB |
Lighting effects | + | + |
Cable | removable braided | removable braided |
General | ||
Power source | battery | battery |
Battery capacity | 600 mAh | 600 mAh |
Battery life | 120 h | 120 h |
Charging port | USB C | USB C |
In box | USB receiver replaceable legs | USB receiver replaceable legs |
Size (LxWxH) | 123x68x38 mm | 123x68x38 mm |
Weight | 65 g | 61 g |
Color | ||
Added to E-Catalog | february 2025 | february 2025 |
Both mice, Hator Pulsar 3 PRO Wireless and Hator Pulsar 3 Ultra 4K Wireless, offer similar features such as a PixArt 3950 optical sensor with a resolution of up to 30000 DPI and the ability to connect via radio signal, Bluetooth, and wired interface. However, the main difference lies in the polling rate: Ultra 4K supports up to 8000 Hz, providing faster response, while PRO is limited to 1000 Hz. Both devices have a symmetrical body, RGB lighting, and programmable buttons, but the Ultra 4K is slightly lighter (61 g versus 65 g for PRO). Both options have the same battery capacity and runtime, making them competitive in terms of autonomy. The choice between them may depend on preferences regarding polling rate and weight.