Support E-Katalog!
Get a Premium subscription for the price of a cup of coffee
Catalog   /   Computing   /   Input Devices   /   Mice

Comparison Hator Pulsar 3 PRO Wireless vs Hator Pulsar 3 Ultra 4K Wireless

Add to comparison
Hator Pulsar 3 PRO Wireless
Hator Pulsar 3 Ultra 4K Wireless
Hator Pulsar 3 PRO WirelessHator Pulsar 3 Ultra 4K Wireless
Compare prices 59Compare prices 57
User reviews
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
TOP sellers
Product typemousemouse
Connectionradio / Bluetooth / wiredradio / Bluetooth / wired
Bluetooth versionv 5.1v 5.1
Multi-Device
InterfaceUSB AUSB A
Cable length1.8 m1.8 m
Range10 m10 m
Sensoropticaloptical
Typefor gamefor game
Sensor and control
SensorPixArt 3950PixArt 3950
Sensor resolution400 – 30000 DPI400 – 30000 DPI
Max. acceleration50 G50 G
Max. polling rate1000 Hz (1 ms)8000 Hz (0.125 ms)
Number of buttons44
Side buttons
DPI-button
Switchesopto-mechanicalopto-mechanical
Switch resource100 million clicks100 million clicks
Scroll wheels11
Features
Feet materialteflon (PTFE)teflon (PTFE)
Programmable buttons
Built-in memory
LightingRGBRGB
Lighting effects++
Cable
removable
braided
removable
braided
General
Power sourcebatterybattery
Battery capacity600 mAh600 mAh
Battery life120 h120 h
Charging portUSB CUSB C
In box
USB receiver
replaceable legs
USB receiver
replaceable legs
Size (LxWxH)123x68x38 mm123x68x38 mm
Weight65 g61 g
Color
Added to E-Catalogfebruary 2025february 2025
Brief conclusions of the comparison mice

Both mice, Hator Pulsar 3 PRO Wireless and Hator Pulsar 3 Ultra 4K Wireless, offer similar features such as a PixArt 3950 optical sensor with a resolution of up to 30000 DPI and the ability to connect via radio signal, Bluetooth, and wired interface. However, the main difference lies in the polling rate: Ultra 4K supports up to 8000 Hz, providing faster response, while PRO is limited to 1000 Hz. Both devices have a symmetrical body, RGB lighting, and programmable buttons, but the Ultra 4K is slightly lighter (61 g versus 65 g for PRO). Both options have the same battery capacity and runtime, making them competitive in terms of autonomy. The choice between them may depend on preferences regarding polling rate and weight.

Price graph
Hator Pulsar 3 PRO Wireless often compared
Hator Pulsar 3 Ultra 4K Wireless often compared
Glossary

Max. polling rate

The polling rate shows how often the mouse sensor exchanges data with the computer about cursor movement. This parameter is measured in hertz (Hz), with one second being taken as the unit of time for its assessment. The smoothness and speed of cursor movement directly depend on the polling rate of the sensor. Directly connected to it is the mouse response time — this is the time interval required for the signal about the manipulator's movement to reach the display of the cursor position change on the screen. Response time is measured in milliseconds (ms). The higher the mouse's "hertz rate," the lesser the response time it demonstrates. The most common value can be considered 1000 Hz with a response time of 1 millisecond. For competitive games, attention should be paid to faster mice, including 2000 Hz, 4000 Hz, and 8000 Hz. Values below might negatively manifest just in gaming scenarios.

Weight

The total weight of the mouse. For models with a wired connection, usually, it is indicated without cable, and for devices with weight adjustment (see above) — without weights.

This parameter is important primarily for professional gaming applications, although it is often relevant for ordinary users. Theoretically, less weight promotes speed and reduces fatigue. At the same time, in fact, much depends on the personal habits and preferences of the user: a mouse that is too light may “not be felt in the hands” and not give familiar feedback. Therefore, although most mice have a lower weight limit of 60 – 80 g, however, even among professional gaming models there are much more massive devices — 120 – 140 g or more. The lightest variety of "rodents" is laptop (see "In the direction"), among them devices come across and less than 60 g.

Also note that the weight to some extent depends on the size and “tricked out” of the device, but there is no unambiguous dependence here: models similar in size and functionality can differ markedly in weight.