Add to comparison | ![]() | ![]() |
---|---|---|
BLUETTI AC70P | BLUETTI PowerOak EB3A | |
Compare prices 107 | Compare prices 93 | |
User reviews | ||
TOP sellers | ||
2 USB A ports, 1 USB C port. Car cigarette lighter port DC5521. Surges up to 1200 W are allowed. Touchscreen. LiFePo4 battery. Wireless charging power 15 W. Flashlight. | ||
In box | charging station | charging station |
Rated power | 1000 W | 600 W |
Peak power | 2000 W | 1200 W |
Output waveform | sinusoid (PSW) | sinusoid (PSW) |
UPS function | ![]() | ![]() |
Outputs | ||
Sockets (230 V) | 2 | 1 |
USB A | 2 5В/2.4А 12 W | 2 5В/3A 15 W |
USB C | 2 5 A 100 W | 1 5 A 100 W |
Wireless charger | 1 zone 15 W | 1 zone 15 W |
Car cigarette lighter | ![]() | ![]() |
DC output | 2 шт DC5521 (12 В / 10 A) | |
Inputs (station charging) | ||
From solar panels | ![]() | ![]() |
DC input | 1 шт (12 – 28 В / 8.5 A) | |
Input port XT60 | ![]() | ![]() |
Battery and charging time | ||
Battery type | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
Battery capacity | 864 W*h | 268 W*h |
Charging cycles | 3000 | 2500 |
Charging time (socket) ≈ | 45 min | 90 min |
Charging time (socket + solar panel) ≈ | 72 min | |
Charging time (solar panel) ≈ | 120 min | 120 min |
Charging time (cigarette lighter) ≈ | 540 min | 120 min |
Charging power (socket) | 950 W | 330 W |
Charging power (solar panel) | 500 W | 200 W |
Charging power (cigarette lighter) | 200 W | |
Charging power (socket + solar panel) | 430 W | |
General | ||
Smartphone synchronization | Bluetooth | Bluetooth |
PSU | built into the body | built into the body |
Display | ![]() | ![]() |
Backlight | ![]() | ![]() |
Carrying handle | ![]() | ![]() |
Operating temperature | 0 °C ~ +40 °C | -10 °C ~ +40 °C |
Dimensions | 256x314x210 mm | 183x255x180 mm |
Weight | 10.2 kg | 4.6 kg |
Warranty | 5 years | 2 years |
Added to E-Catalog | april 2024 | october 2022 |
When comparing the BLUETTI AC70P and BLUETTI PowerOak EB3A charging stations, several key points can be highlighted. The AC70P has a higher rated power of 1000W and peaks at 2000W, allowing it to connect more powerful devices such as refrigerators and coffee machines without issues. Users note its high autonomy and fast charging, as well as the presence of a UPS function. Meanwhile, the EB3A has a power output of 600W and is suitable for less demanding devices such as routers and small TVs. Although the EB3A is lighter and more compact, it has a smaller capacity and can be noisier during charging. Users mention that the EB3A is convenient to carry and has a good set of ports, including wireless charging. However, the AC70P receives more positive feedback for its power and reliability during power outages. Overall, the choice between these models depends on your needs: the AC70P is better suited for more serious tasks, while the EB3A is suitable for lighter use.