Add to comparison | ![]() | ![]() |
---|---|---|
BLUETTI AC70 | BLUETTI PowerOak EB70 | |
Compare prices 51 | Compare prices 78 | |
User reviews | ||
TOP sellers | ||
Pass-through charging. 2 USB A ports, 2 USB C ports. Car cigarette lighter. Surges up to 2000 W are allowed. LiFePo4 battery. | 2 USB A ports, 2 USB C ports. Car cigarette lighter port DC5521. Jumps up to 1400 W are allowed. LiFePo4 battery. Wireless charging power 15 W. Flashlight | |
In box | charging station | charging station |
Rated power | 1000 W | 1000 W |
Peak power | 2000 W | 1400 W |
Output waveform | sinusoid (PSW) | sinusoid (PSW) |
UPS function | ![]() | ![]() |
Outputs | ||
Sockets (230 V) | 2 | 2 |
USB A | 2 pcs 5В/2.4А 12 W | 2 pcs 5В/3A 15 W |
USB C | 2 pcs 3 A, 5 A 100 W | 2 pcs 3 A, 5 A 100 W |
Wireless charger | 1 zone 15 W | |
Car cigarette lighter | ![]() | ![]() |
DC output | 2 шт DC5521 (12 В / 10 A) | |
Inputs (station charging) | ||
From solar panels | ![]() | ![]() |
DC input | 1 шт DC7909 (12 – 28 В / 8 А) | |
Input port XT60 | ![]() | ![]() |
Battery and charging time | ||
Connecting an additional battery | ![]() | ![]() |
Battery type | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
Battery capacity | 768 W*h | 716 W*h |
Charging cycles | 3000 | 2500 |
Charging time (socket) ≈ | 45 min | 240 min |
Charging time (solar panel) ≈ | 120 min | 360 min |
Charging time (cigarette lighter) ≈ | 300 min | 480 min |
Charging power (socket) | 850 W | 200 W |
Charging power (solar panel) | 500 W | 200 W |
Charging power (cigarette lighter) | 100 W | |
Charging power (socket + solar panel) | 1000 W | |
General | ||
Smartphone synchronization | Bluetooth | |
PSU | built into the body | external |
Display | ![]() | ![]() |
Backlight | ![]() | ![]() |
Carrying handle | ![]() | ![]() |
Operating temperature | 0 °C ~ +40 °C | 0 °C ~ +40 °C |
Dimensions | 256x314x210 mm | 221x320x216 mm |
Weight | 10.2 kg | 9.7 kg |
Warranty | 5 years | 2 years |
Added to E-Catalog | june 2024 | september 2022 |
The charging stations BLUETTI AC70 and BLUETTI PowerOak EB70 have similar nominal power ratings of 1000 W, but the AC70 offers a higher peak power of 2000 W compared to 1400 W for the EB70. Users note that the AC70 performs well, especially when used to power refrigerators and other devices, and has a convenient management application. Meanwhile, the EB70 has a lower charging power (200 W), and users report issues with reliability and slow charging. The AC70 also offers a longer battery lifespan (3000 cycles) compared to 2500 for the EB70, making it a more preferable choice for long-term use. Overall, the AC70 receives more positive feedback for its functionality and reliability, while the EB70 may be suitable for less demanding users.