Укр|Eng|Рус
Ukraine
Catalog   /   Small Appliances   /   Kitchen   /   Electric Kettles

Comparison Clatronic WKR 3624 1000 W 0.5 L stainless steel vs UNOLD 18575 1000 W 0.5 L stainless steel

Add to comparison
Clatronic WKR 3624 1000 W 0.5 L  stainless steel
UNOLD 18575 1000 W 0.5 L  stainless steel
Clatronic WKR 3624 1000 W 0.5 L stainless steelUNOLD 18575 1000 W 0.5 L stainless steel
Compare prices 4
from 1 512 ₴
Expecting restock
TOP sellers
Main
Includes carrying bag, two cups and two spoons
TypeElectric KettleElectric Kettle
Volume0.5 L0.5 L
Technical specs
Power consumption1000 W1000 W
Heating elementhiddenhidden
Coating of the heating elementstainless steelstainless steel
Water level indicatoris absentis absent
General
Body shapecylindrical
Materialsteelsteel
Dimensions17.7х12.516.8 cm
Color
Added to E-Catalogjune 2016april 2016

Body shape

The general shape of the body of the electric kettle.

Conical. The most popular option: a body is wide at the base and tapering upwards. This form contributes to stability: the centre of gravity is maximally displaced downwards. However washing such a kettle from the inside may not be very convenient due to the relatively small size of the opening in the upper part.

Cylindrical. The cylindrical shape provides more or less the same width of the body at the base and at the top. With the same height and base diameter, such kettles hold slightly more water than conical ones; in addition, such a device is easier to clean due to the wide opening for the lid.

Inclined. The body which is inclined forward; the width of such a body is usually more or less the same over the entire height. Such kettles have an unusual, eye-catching appearance; in addition, it is easier to pour water from them — the device must be inclined at a smaller angle than with a cylindrical and even with a conical body. However, this option does not provide fundamental advantages over the same cylindrical shape, but it is more expensive, and therefore is not common.
Price graph
Clatronic WKR 3624 often compared