Add to comparison | ![]() | ![]() |
---|---|---|
Foscam R2 | Foscam C2 | |
from 5 659 ₴ | from 2 990 ₴ | |
Mount | indoor | indoor |
Body type | portable (desktop) | portable (desktop) |
Connection | LAN Wi-Fi | LAN Wi-Fi |
Camera features | ||
Design and features | motion detection microphone feedback speaker mobile app motion alert IR illumination card reader | motion detection microphone feedback speaker mobile app motion alert IR illumination card reader |
Number of LEDs | 13 | |
Illumination range | 8 m | 8 m |
Matrix | ||
Matrix type | CMOS | CMOS |
Matrix size | 1/3" | 1/3" |
Number of megapixels | 2 MP | 2 MP |
Video resolution | 1920x1080 px | 1920x1080 px |
Frame rate | 25 fps | 25 fps |
Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.6 |
Lens | ||
Focal type | permanent | permanent |
Focal length | 2.8 mm | 2.8 mm |
Horizontal viewing angle | 90 ° | 110 ° |
General | ||
Video compression format | H.264 | H.264 |
Power source | 5 В | 5 В |
Operating temperature | -10 °C ~ +50 °С | -10 °C ~ +50 °С |
Maximum humidity | 85 % | 85 % |
Material | plastic | plastic |
Dimensions | 74x74x119 mm | 70x70x120 mm |
Weight | 290 g | 160 g |
Color | ||
Added to E-Catalog | september 2016 | september 2016 |
Cameras Foscam R2 and C2 have similar features such as indoor use, the ability to connect via LAN and Wi-Fi, as well as motion detection and IR illumination functions. However, R2 has 13 LEDs for illumination, while C2 does not specify their number. The viewing angle of C2 is 110°, which is wider than the 90° of R2. Also, R2 consumes more energy (6W compared to 4.8W for C2). Overall, the choice between them may depend on preferences for viewing angle and power consumption.