Add to comparison | ![]() | ![]() |
---|---|---|
BLUETTI AC60 | BLUETTI PowerOak EB55 | |
Compare prices 63 | Compare prices 61 | |
User reviews | ||
TOP sellers | ||
4 USB A ports, 1 USB C port. Car cigarette lighter, DC5521 port. Jumps up to 1400 watts are allowed. Touchscreen. LiPo4 battery. 15W wireless charging power. Flashlight. | ||
In box | charging station | charging station |
Rated power | 600 W | 700 W |
Peak power | 1200 W | 1400 W |
Output waveform | sinusoid (PSW) | sinusoid (PSW) |
UPS function | ![]() | ![]() |
Outputs | ||
Sockets (230 V) | 2 | 2 |
USB A | 2 pcs 5В/3A | 4 pcs 5В/3A |
USB C | 1 pcs 3 A, 5 A 100 W | 1 pcs 5 A 100 W |
Wireless charger | 1 zone 15 W | 1 zone 15 W |
Car cigarette lighter | ![]() | ![]() |
DC output | 2 шт DC5521 (12 В / 10 A) | |
Inputs (station charging) | ||
From solar panels | ![]() | ![]() |
DC input | 1 шт DC7909 (12 – 28 В / 8 А / 200 Вт) | 1 шт DC7909 (25 – 28 В / 10 А) |
Input port XT60 | ![]() | ![]() |
Battery and charging time | ||
Connecting an additional battery | ![]() | ![]() |
Battery type | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
Battery capacity | 403.2 W*h | 537 W*h |
Charging cycles | 3000 | 2500 |
Charging time (socket) ≈ | 90 min | 210 min |
Charging time (socket + solar panel) ≈ | 138 min | |
Charging time (solar panel) ≈ | 180 min | 210 min |
Charging time (cigarette lighter) ≈ | 300 min | |
Charging power (socket) | 600 W | 200 W |
Charging power (solar panel) | 200 W | 200 W |
Charging power (cigarette lighter) | 196 W | |
Charging power (socket + solar panel) | 400 W | |
General | ||
PSU | built into the body | external |
Display | ![]() | ![]() |
Backlight | ![]() | ![]() |
Carrying handle | ![]() | ![]() |
Operating temperature | 0 °C ~ +40 °C | -20 °C ~ +40 °C |
Dimensions | 290x205x234 mm | 198x278x200 mm |
Weight | 8.6 kg | 7.5 kg |
Warranty | 6 years | 2 years |
Added to E-Catalog | july 2023 | september 2022 |
When comparing the BLUETTI AC60 and BLUETTI PowerOak EB55 charging stations, one can note that the AC60 has a rated power of 600 W and a peak power of 1200 W, while the EB55 offers a slightly higher rated power of 700 W and a peak power of 1400 W. Both devices have a sine wave output and 2 outlets each, but the EB55 offers more USB ports (4 versus 2 on the AC60). In terms of batteries, the AC60 has a capacity of 18 Ah and more charging cycles (3000), whereas the EB55 offers 24 Ah but with fewer cycles (2500). The charging time from the grid for the AC60 is about 90 minutes, which is significantly faster than the 210 minutes for the EB55. However, the EB55 operates in a wider temperature range (-20 °C to +40 °C), whereas the AC60 ranges from 0 °C to +40 °C. Both devices have convenient carrying handles and displays, but the EB55 offers additional ports and features such as a touch display and a flashlight. Overall, the choice between them depends on your needs: if charging speed and longevity are important, it is better to choose the AC60, whereas if a greater number of outputs and operation in cold conditions are needed, then the EB55.