GOODRAM CX400 SSDPR-CX400-128 128 GB
![]() | Outdated Product 929 ₴ Placement: internal; Size (GB): 128; Form factor: 2.5"; Controller: Phison PS3111-S11; Write speed (MB/s): 450; Read speed (MB/s): 550; Manufacturer's warranty: 3 years; TRIM; |
GOODRAM SSDPR-CX400-128 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog GOODRAM 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models GOODRAM.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog GOODRAM 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models GOODRAM.

TLC, QLC, MLC, SLC: which type of drive memory is better?Important differences between the types of NAND memory TLC, QLC, MLC, SLC, which determine the scope of their use and development prospects

How to choose the right SSD?Choosing an SSD with the required speed and good reliability for home, work and gaming
2 1 3 0 |
i got the 256GB version for $50, originally to replace a deceased HDD on a 2003-5 computer. The system loaded, but it didn’t start: as we read on the internet, it was due to AHCI, which we didn’t have. We were disappointed, and after a year, we got a laptop, which had an NVME SSD, so there was no real need to install this one - we didn't want to void the warranty and felt it was a waste to spend $12.5 on something so trivial. So, we put this SSD into an external case; USB3.0 clearly wouldn't limit this device, I thought, and it turned out to be true because when filled to 25% with just one game, the speed in CrystalDiscMark showed 460MB/s for reading and 258MB/s for writing. Similar models had significantly better reading speeds. Even the worst NVME SSD in the laptop for 6000 lei has radically higher speeds—2134MB/s for reading and 180MB/s for writing, but forgive me, it’s filled to 52%, so it seems to me the "good memory" lacks reading speed. Overall, if you aren’t a picky fool like me, compared to an HDD, it's a monster; formatting takes a few seconds, and installing Windows XP takes 3 minutes compared to 15 on the dead HDD. Files transfer quickly; the benchmark speed matches real-world speed—I haven’t transferred heavy files, but those up to 1GB indeed load at 250MB/s. It's also significantly lighter than an HDD even compared to a 2.5" one - you can feel it, and they're silent, which is pleasing, as is the fact that they're solid-state. When a friend dropped my 2.5" HDD from a height of 10cm, my heart sank, and I started checking for bad sectors, but with this drive, I'm at ease. compliance with the speed stated in the benchmark, quietness, weight, phone compatibility (HDDs don't have this), durability (I'm not worried about it like I am with my 1TB HDD), appearance (no frills, unremarkable), presence of a 32MB buffer. I'm not sure how much it helps, but it transfers small files without "throttling," it formats very quickly - less than a minute even to a different file system, price - $50 for 256GB, and with its parameters, it was an excellent option for me, others, as tests showed, were worse or identical. low reading speed - 460MB/s is like the cheapest options, it's very disappointing because other drives offered up to 550MB/s, but who knows how they would perform when filled at 25MB/s it's also frustrating that it didn't work with a bucket from 2004... but that's minor ![]() |
The case is made of matte black plastic, with stickers on both sides. According to the barcode - Poland. It operates on a single-core dual-channel Phison PS3111-S11 controller without an external DRAM buffer, with key functions utilizing 32 MB of built-in SDRAM buffer within the controller itself. In the linear write test, the initial speed was 462 MB/s with a claimed 490. The SLC cache is about 2.5-3% of the free memory volume, which is a maximum of approximately +-6-8GB, and beyond that, the speed drops to 78 MB/s. The temperature sensor was found to be locked and did not change throughout the tests. Disk tests can be viewed on YouTube below: https://youtu. good speed performance, mean time between failure, price, 3-year warranty, Polish assembly missing temperature sensor, small SLC cache 2.5-3% |
I have been using it for more than 3 months, I took it for Windows and VR. everything seems to be cool - on the first tests there were all the declared 550 mb / s. Now, in terms of download speed in windows and games, the difference between the SSD and the new HDD is practically not noticeable (maybe it's in windows itself), but still the SSD is much more mobile, for example, if you need to take VR with you, just take an SSD, graphics card and the VR glasses themselves. price - quality - use GOODRAM SSDPR-CX400-256 few months |
3 out of 6 user review(s) shown
3 more user review(s)
Video reviews