GOODRAM PX500 GEN.3 SSDPR-PX500-01T-80-G3 1 TB
![]() |
GOODRAM SSDPR-PX500-01T-80-G3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog GOODRAM 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models GOODRAM.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog GOODRAM 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models GOODRAM.

TLC, QLC, MLC, SLC: which type of drive memory is better?Important differences between the types of NAND memory TLC, QLC, MLC, SLC, which determine the scope of their use and development prospects

How to choose the right SSD?Choosing an SSD with the required speed and good reliability for home, work and gaming
Buy GOODRAM PX500 GEN.3 SSDPR-PX500-01T-80-G3 1 TB
All prices 61 →SSD-диск GoodRAM PX500 Gen.3 3D NAND 1TB M.2 (2280 PCI-E) NVMe x4 (SSDPR-PX500-01T-80-G3) SSDPR-PX500-01T-80-G3 | 2 755 ₴ | ![]() | |||
GoodRam SSD диск GoodRam PX500 G3 (SSDPR-PX500-01T-80-G3) 1TB | 2 499 ₴ | ![]() | |||
Накопичувач SSD 1TB Goodram PX500 M.2 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe 3D TLC (SSDPR-PX500-01T-80-G3) SSDPR-PX500-01T-80-G3 | 2 337 ₴ | ![]() | |||
SSD накопичувач Goodram PX500 G3 M.2 1TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 2280 SSDPR-PX500-01T-80-G3 | 2 383 ₴ | ![]() | |||
Накопичувач SSD M.2 1TB PX500 G3 NVMe PCIe 4.0 2280 GOODRAM (SSDPR-PX500-01T-80-G3) | 2 346 ₴ | ![]() |
20 more offer(s)
GOODRAM PX500 GEN.3 SSDPR-PX500-01T-80-G3 configurations
Price for GOODRAM PX500 GEN.3 SSDPR-PX500-01T-80-G3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | GOODRAM PX500 GEN.3 SSDPR-PX500-256-80-G3 256 GB | from 1 185 ₴ | 32 offers | |
![]() | GOODRAM PX500 GEN.3 SSDPR-PX500-512-80-G3 512 GB | from 1 479 ₴ | 28 offers | |
![]() | GOODRAM PX500 GEN.3 SSDPR-PX500-01T-80-G3 1 TB | from 2 316 ₴ | 62 offers | |
![]() | GOODRAM PX500 GEN.3 SSDPR-PX500-02T-80-G3 2 TB | from 5 947 ₴ | 2 offers |
We recommendCompare using chart →