Intel Core i5 Ivy Bridge i5-3470 (BX80637I53470)
 |
 |
Close
Intel Core i5 Ivy Bridge i5-3470 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Information in model description is for reference purposes.
Before buying always check characteristics and configuration of product with online store manager
Catalog Intel 2024 - new products, best sales and most actual models Intel.
Before buying always check characteristics and configuration of product with online store manager
Catalog Intel 2024 - new products, best sales and most actual models Intel.
Why is the new processor faster at the same frequency?The main factors that make new processes faster without increasing clock speeds
How to choose a CPU?How to choose the right CPU for any task, from spreadsheets to modern games and work applications
AccessoriesAll accessories for Intel i5-3470 →
Model overview based on user reviews
The Intel i5-3470 processor is highly valued for its excellent performance in gaming and multitasking, maintaining low temperatures even under heavy load. Users appreciate its overclocking potential and integrated graphics, making it a versatile choice for budget gaming builds. However, the stock cooler is often seen as inadequate, and some users have noted price increases over time. Overall, it remains a strong option for those looking to build a capable gaming PC without spending too much money.
Pros
Cons
0 0 3 57 |
Холодний, дешевий, конкурентноспроможний.Добре підійде для неважких завдань.
Мало споживае, та невеликий рівень TDP Застаріла платформа і всі болячки що звідси виходять.  Reverse_rain: use Intel i5-3470 more than year |
I highly recommend this pro. for those who have socket 1155, 4 cores and 4 threads do their job! and the price is good too :) Price, quality, speed, efficiency. and they don't exist, sir. |
Greetings from 2019, even closer to 2020 (10/18/19). I am the happy owner of this proca from 12/17/12. I bought it then for 2k UAH. What can I say about him. I can say that it was not in vain that at that time I took version K (unlocked multiplier). Until the end of 2017, this percentage without overclocking took all popular projects at maximum speeds in a 60Hz Full HD monitor. The bundle was originally with the GTX 660ti until 11/25/2017. On this date, I bought myself a replacement in the form of an Aorus GTX 1070. It is clear that the bunch of Prots, RAM (ddr3 16gb 1666) with this vidyuha lags behind for years. It was decided to disperse the percent. I managed to take 4500 MHz the first time without any special manipulations (almost automatically in the BIOS). Efficiency in relation to frequency / stability / heat dissipation / performance after the 4.5 MHz mark is not satisfactory, as for me. Yes, by the way, the motherboard is Asus p8z77-v + Zalman csnp12x cooling.
Until 2018, I had enough processor performance in all the most recent projects. But then there were such games as mass effect Andromeda, Shadow of the tomb Rider. And already in them I saw the limit of this process. When at 4.5 MHz for all 4 cores the load is 100% and the vidyuha is only 70% resting. And then, it is in certain locations or scenes. Yes, a bunch of other resource-intensive games have come out at the moment, but not everyone has the opportunity to try this bundle ... Nevertheless, 13-19 years in 80% of games out of 100%, this percentage calmly takes on high-ultra full HD 60fps. But after that came the 4th 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and now the 9th generation of Intel processors for 6 years. And this fact, I think, speaks volumes...
The review is of course no longer relevant, because. this guy has long since retired. But here and now, only in 2019, I thought it was time to change it to the 9th generation of Intel, ideally I9-9900K(S), and then just to satisfy my needs for 20% of the games I play, or I want to play... Up to this point, the I5-3570K has worked at 100% of its capabilities. I can only say thank you to the old man, for all these years! Performance, and stability with a margin of 5+ years. For 6 years there is no reason to say anything in the minus of this pro. Dragon Light: use Intel i5-3570K more than year |
3 out of 60 user review(s) shown
10 more user review(s)
Intel Core i5 Ivy Bridge configurations
| Price for Intel Core i5 Ivy Bridge | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5 Ivy Bridge i5-3330 | from 999 ₴ | 1 offer | |
| Intel Core i5 Ivy Bridge i5-3470 | from 880 ₴ | 4 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Ivy Bridge i5-3470S | from 1 030 ₴ | 2 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Ivy Bridge i5-3570 | from 1 020 ₴ | 3 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Ivy Bridge i5-3570K | from 1 390 ₴ | 2 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Ivy Bridge i5-3570S | from 2 098 ₴ | 1 offer | |
We recommend
Intel LGA 1155, cores 4, threads 4, 3 GHz, TurboBoost 3.2 GHz, process technology 22 nm, HD Graphics 2500, integrated graphics, TDP 77 W, память ОЗУ: maximum 32 GB
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 4 , threads 8 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.6 / 3.8 GHz, TurboBoost 3.9 / 4.3 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 4.1 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.7 / 3.8 GHz, TurboBoost 4.6 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent / Radeon Vega 8
Intel LGA 1151 v2, 35 - 95 W, cores 6 , threads 6 threads, process technology 14 nm, 2.2 - 3.7 GHz, TurboBoost 3.7 - 4.6 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 2666 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 630
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.7 GHz, TurboBoost 4.2 GHz, maximum 64 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, Radeon Vega 7
AMD AM4, 35 / 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.4 - 3.9 GHz, TurboBoost 4.2 - 4.6 GHz, maximum - / 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent - Radeon
Intel LGA 1700, 65 / 125 W, cores 10 / 14 , 6P+4E, 6P+8E, threads 16 / 20 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 4800 / 5600 MHz, is absent - UHD Graphics 770
AMD AM5, 65 - 120 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 5 nm, TurboBoost 5 - 5.4 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR5 5200 MHz, Radeon
Intel LGA 1700, 65 - 150 W, cores 24 , 8P+16E, threads 32 threads, process technology 10 nm, TurboBoost 5.6 - 6 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 5600 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 770
Intel LGA 1700, 65 / 125 W, cores 16 , 8P+8E, threads 24 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 5600 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 770
Intel LGA 1700, 65 / 125 W, cores 10 / 14 , 6P+4E, 6P+8E, threads 16 / 20 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 192 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 4800 / 5600 MHz, is absent - UHD Graphics 770
Смішно, але я лише нещодавно його замінив. Купив я його у 2013 році, зробив собі апгрейд. Навіть пам'ятаю, материнська плата, процесор та оперативна пам'ять коштукала мені 3000 грн, ото ціни були. Зараз би так на нові процесори інтела та амд. Мрії-мрії.І насправді його цілком вистачало для домашнього ПК, вистачало на ігри в FullHD, не кажучи про іншу мультимедію.
Цей процессор має 4 ядра і 4 потоки. І тактова частота в районі 3.2Гц. І для мене було достатньо щоб пройти навіть Cyberpunk 2077 при 40 фпс, при середніх-високих налаштуваннях. Стояв він у мене під баштою be quiet! Pure Rock 2. Максимальна температура була в районі 57 градусів, то ж він доволі холодний, навіть при використанні башт початковго і середнього сегменту.
Апгрейд був обумовлений тим що все ж процесор не підтримую сучасні технології, як Pci Express 5.0, DDR 5, плат під них вже доволі мало, та і процессор у більшості завдань бився у 100 відсотків навантаження. І нічого з цим зробити було неможливо.
Брати 3470 у 2025 році? Дуже дивне рішення. Але чому ні? Якщо ви хочете зробити невелику, дешеву систему сккажімо під домашню чи дачну систему мультимедіа, для фільмів, серіалів, музики, та інтернету, та навіть при потужній відеокарті можна в ігри пограти.