AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse 3800XT BOX (100-100000279WOF)
![]() | Expecting restock 15 969 ₴ Socket: AMD AM4; Cores (cores): 8; Threads (threads): 16; Speed (GHz): 3.9; IGP: is absent; PCI Express: 4.0; |
AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse 3800XT BOX | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog AMD 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models AMD.


0 3 1 6 |
Expensive, unstoppable Doubtful savings on mother Two cores give errors in osst after half a year, did not drive and so hot, failure in warranty ![]() |
I got myself a 3700X box for my setup: - Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - Crucial Ballistix DDR4 2x16Gb BL2K16G32C16U4B - Kingston A2000 M.2 SA2000M8/500G I bought all this to replace my old 3570K with overclocking and 16GB (4x4). For some reason, on my new Asus motherboard, the voltage was set to the max for the processor, over 1.4V. I'm puzzled why the factory does this because, with such a setup, the CPU and chipset on the motherboard would heat up to 50-60°C just with Chrome and Photoshop running under a load not exceeding 20-30%. After adjusting it manually to 1.25V, it immediately dropped by 10°C without any loss of performance. Overall, compared to the old one, it works faster, but I never felt it was twice as fast, and now I'm wondering why I bothered with the 3700X. I could have just as easily gone for the 3600X or Intel 10500. Since I occasionally do video rendering with my GTX1070 Founders, both the new and old CPUs render 1 hour of video in Premiere in about 10 minutes, with the CPU load at 50-60%. So, can someone tell me what those 8 cores and 16 threads are actually doing when the time is almost the same on the old 4-core processor? Okay, let's remove the GPU from rendering, and what do I see? 100% CPU load and 1 hour to render = 1 hour, which is exactly what I got with the old CPU... This is a fiasco for AMD. Basically, the point of buying this CPU is nearly zero because the performance gain is maybe 15-20%, at most 30% with DDR4 memory over 7 years... - We'll assume it's 7nm, I hope they're really there - 8 cores, still more than 4 in my old CPU and make it a bit faster - It's cheaper than Intel, but that doesn't mean much in fact - A decent cooler included, if you don't have a good one, this will do for a while - AMD sticker =) - 16 threads of nonsense and everyday realities to the back seat - 65W TDP nonsense because on b550 motherboards it heats up like a demon (hello AMD heaters, and I thought this wasn't an issue with the new ones) at 1.4V. And this is considering I have it under Noctua NH-D14 and two 140mm Fractal Design intake fans in the case. Even lowering the voltage, I think it should run cooler. - It's not worth buying it, better to get a cheaper option and with the saved money, get a decent graphics card (RTX 2060 Super or higher) and a fast SSD, you'll get more real benefit. - Lack of integrated video, some might say it's unnecessary but in critical moments, this thing is a lifesaver. - Watched loads of video reviews and comparisons, thought I was getting a plane but ended up with a meh processor.. Someone might say it's an excellent chip but I disagree because in my practical usage scenarios, it doesn't prove to be. It's just a hyped and overrated Ryzen. ![]() |
Everyone who writes that this is garbage, compare it with the Intel Core 9900k, the blue team wins by some 8-10%, but if you have to change the mother for the blue ones for each percentage, then AMD has more opportunities for upgrading. If you calculate in total how much a computer from AMD, and from Intel and Nvidia will cost, then the conclusion is obvious that the red ones will give you quality for your money, and if you count more upgrades in the future, then the red ones will save your fortune The difference with the 2700X is strong, but also in performance between both of them - this processor is much better. ![]() |
AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse configurations
Price for AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse 3700 PRO OEM | from 16 512 ₴ | 1 offer | |
![]() | AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse 3700X BOX | from 4 440 ₴ | 4 offers | |
![]() | AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse 3700X OEM | from 4 745 ₴ | 23 offers | |
![]() | AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse 3800X BOX | from 5 999 ₴ | 4 offers | |
![]() | AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse 3800X OEM | from 7 739 ₴ | 1 offer | |
![]() | AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse 3800XT OEM | from 8 389 ₴ | 1 offer |
Flagship octa-core processor from AMD
The Ryzen 7 3800XT is an octa-core CPU with SMT technology from the updated Matisse family, which operates at a base frequency of 3.9 GHz. In fact, we have before us a cosmetic update of the almost flagship Ryzen 7 Matisse 3800X, which raised the nominal frequencies a little, dropped the price a little and put it in a new box. Accordingly, all the advantages remained in place: a 7-nm process technology, a free multiplier, a significant amount of cache memory (32 MB), support for high-speed memory modules and outstanding performance in distributed tasks, rendering and computational operations.
Outstanding rendering, content and compute performance
Given that both the regular Ryzen 7 3800 and the XT version in stores are actually asking for the same amount, something else is interesting here. After the release of the new AMD Vermeer family, this chip is slightly above the middle in terms of coolness in the entire Ryzen line, yielding to monsters like the Ryzen 9 3900XT, but at the same time ahead of last year's bestseller Ryzen 5 3600. Just think about it: the 16-thread processor is now in the middle level! Although in fact this is the same Core i9, which a couple of years ago remained the lot of exclusively enthusiasts.
Low power consumption and backlog for overclocking
In application applications, the Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900K without any problems, but lags a little in games, almost as much as it is cheaper. Thanks to the refined process, it overclocks well and the performance gap is narrowed, while its power consumption is lower than that of the competitor. But, like the opponent, in this mode it works on the edge and requires more efficient cooling. Not surprisingly, AMD decided to remove the boxed Wraith Prism cooler from the box, which could hardly cope with automatic overclocking, let alone manual overclocking. Therefore, to unlock the potential of the Matisse 3800XT, the manufacturer recommends using a powerful tower or a larger ready-made dropsy.