Intel Core i5 Kaby Lake i5-7600K BOX (BX80677I57600K)
 |
 |
Close
Intel Core i5 Kaby Lake i5-7600K BOX | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Packing type: BOX (without cooler)
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Intel 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Intel.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Intel 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Intel.
Why is the new processor faster at the same frequency?The main factors that make new processes faster without increasing clock speeds
How to choose a CPU?How to choose the right CPU for any task, from spreadsheets to modern games and work applications
AccessoriesAll accessories for Intel i5-7600K BOX →
Model overview based on user reviews
The Intel Core i5 Kaby Lake processors, including models like the i5-7400 and i5-7600K, were once considered ideal for gaming due to their performance and price in 2017. However, by 2020, they have become less competitive, with users noting that they often hit 100% load during gaming, causing micro stutters and making it difficult to run other applications simultaneously. While they maintain good temperature control and can handle basic tasks, they struggle with modern games, especially when paired with higher-end GPUs. For those considering a purchase, alternatives like the Ryzen 5 3600 offer better performance at a similar or lower price. Overall, the i5 Kaby Lake series is seen as outdated and not worth its current price, especially for gaming enthusiasts.
Pros
Cons
0 3 2 2 |
I have been using it for more than 3 years, now I am planning to upgrade to i5 10600k. In 2017 and 2018, it was worth the money, but now in 2020, due to great competition, it is better to take a closer look at the Ryzen 5 3600 or AI 5 9600k, their price is 7.5 thousand less and more productive than this percentage. Price in 2017. At that time, it was the perfect processor for gaming. Cool In 2020, it's not worth your attention. Price (price/quality ratio) It really hits 100 percent load in every game. It's impossible to work with other programs outside the game. use Intel i5-7600K BOX more than year |
I still use an excellent stone, I went through all the new items on it, sem 4 resident evil 3 remake, everything flies in combination with the rtx 2060. I don’t have any friezes as they write here, the Stone is shaded with a bang, coupled with a good video camera Cold pulls everything sow day for 2020 No, taking into account good video use Intel i5-7600 BOX more than year |
For that kind of money, it's better to consider Ryzen, especially the R5 3600, for the same price. Basically, there are none. Doesn't play games, even if it does, it crashes at 100%, which makes it impossible to open other applications, low price/performance use Intel i5-7400 BOX more than year |
3 out of 7 user review(s) shown
4 more user review(s)
Intel Core i5 Kaby Lake configurations
| Price for Intel Core i5 Kaby Lake | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5 Kaby Lake i5-7400 BOX | from 1 300 ₴ | 3 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Kaby Lake i5-7400 OEM | from 1 599 ₴ | 2 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Kaby Lake i5-7400T OEM | from 2 665 ₴ | 1 offer | |
| Intel Core i5 Kaby Lake i5-7500 BOX | from 1 690 ₴ | 4 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Kaby Lake i5-7500 OEM | from 1 700 ₴ | 3 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Kaby Lake i5-7500T BOX | from 13 152 ₴ | 1 offer | |
| Intel Core i5 Kaby Lake i5-7500T OEM | from 2 794 ₴ | 1 offer | |
| Intel Core i5 Kaby Lake i5-7600 OEM | from 1 990 ₴ | 4 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Kaby Lake i5-7600K BOX | from 2 150 ₴ | 2 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Kaby Lake i5-7600K OEM | from 2 790 ₴ | 2 offers | |
We recommend
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 4 , threads 8 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 3.9 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 4.1 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent
AMD WRX8, 280 W, cores 12 - 32 , threads 24 - 64 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.5 - 4 GHz, TurboBoost 4.2 / 4.3 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent
Intel LGA 1200, 35 - 125 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 14 nm, 1.4 - 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 4.6 - 5 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 750
AMD AM4, 35 / 65 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.2 - 3.8 GHz, TurboBoost 4.6 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent / Radeon Vega 8
Intel LGA 1151 v2, 35 - 95 W, cores 6 , threads 6 threads, process technology 14 nm, 2.3 - 3.7 GHz, TurboBoost 3.9 - 4.6 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 2666 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 630
AMD AM4, 35 / 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.4 - 3.9 GHz, TurboBoost 4.2 - 4.6 GHz, maximum - / 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent - Radeon
Intel LGA 1700, 35 - 125 W, cores 10 / 14 , 6P+4E, 6P+8E, threads 16 / 20 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 4800 / 5600 MHz, is absent - UHD Graphics 770
AMD AM5, 65 - 120 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 5 nm, TurboBoost 5 - 5.4 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR5 5200 MHz, Radeon
Intel LGA 1700, 65 - 150 W, cores 24 , 8P+16E, threads 32 threads, process technology 10 nm, TurboBoost 5.6 - 6 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 5600 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 770
Intel LGA 1700, 35 - 125 W, cores 16 , 8P+8E, threads 24 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 5600 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 770
Intel LGA 1700, 35 - 125 W, cores 10 / 14 , 6P+4E, 6P+8E, threads 16 / 20 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 192 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 4800 / 5600 MHz, is absent - UHD Graphics 770