Asus Radeon RX 6600 Dual
 |
 |
Asus Radeon RX 6600 Dual | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A sufficiently powerful mid-range gaming graphics card introduced to the market in 2021. This is a variation of the Radeon RX 6600 from Asus, released as part of the widely popular Dual family of graphics cards. Overall, this card is capable of delivering a comfortable frame rate in popular PC games from 2015-2021 at maximum graphic settings in FullHD resolution. At the core is the AMD Navi 23 GPU, constructed with 7-nm process technology and RDNA 2 microarchitecture, featuring 32 powerful enhanced compute units and AMD Infinity Cache.
It comes with 8GB of GDDR6 video memory with a classic 128-bit data exchange bus, which generally allows for rendering highly detailed textures. Such a hardware platform, combined with support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6 APIs, provides the Asus Radeon RX 6600 Dual with 20-30% higher performance than previous generation models. A stable temperature mode is ensured by a large 2.5-slot cooling system equipped with two Axial-tech fans featuring elongated blades and a heat pipe system. The device automatically stops the fans when the GPU temperature is below 55°C, ensuring a silent mode of operation.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Asus 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Asus.
Top value for money Quiet, powerful, doesn't consume much There's an issue during YouTube sessions lasting more than 6 hours; there's a flicker on the monitor for a microsecond, and then some sounds come from the graphics card. Sounds like crackling or buzzing.  Rodіon Mіtchenok: use Asus Radeon RX 6600 Dual less than month |
quietly, efficiently, productively what are the disadvantages of this model? |
quiet, cold, high-performance card, when it doesn’t heat up, the fans don’t spin - |
The Asus Radeon RX 6600 XT is a dual-slot modification of the popular Radeon graphics card based on the AMD Navi 23 GPU (RDNA 2, 7nm manufacturing process). Equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 video memory, supports AMD's proprietary upscaling system FidelityFX. At the beginning of 2023, this is perhaps one of the most interesting options for playing in Full HD resolution. The Gpucheck portal, which collects data from tests in a whole bunch of games, and then displays the average FPS, says that at 1080p resolution on "ultra" the card produces an average of 136 FPS. However, these are average figures, which were strongly influenced by Valorant, Fallout 76, Destiny and other online games with far from the most beautiful graphics and modest requirements. Therefore, we go further.
Now let's move on to a comparison with a direct competitor - the popular GeFroce RTX 3060, which did not become popular only because of the greed of NVIDIA and the efforts of miners. So, with a resolution of 1080p and "high" graphics settings, a representative of the red camp outperforms a competitor in green shorts by 4 - 9% FPS, depending on the game. In general, the brainchild of Radeon knocks out a stable 60+ FPS in rather “heavy” games a la Elden Ring, God Of War and Forza Horizon 5. At the same time, the Asus RX 6600 XT modification can be bought for about $60 cheaper than the dual-slot versions of RTX 3060.
Direct competitor to GeForce RTX 3060
Finally, a little fly in the ointment in our barrel of honey. When the resolution is increased to 2K, the hero of our review begins to slightly lag behind the RTX 3060. And the higher the resolution, the greater the lag. Apparently, a narrower bus and a smaller cache volume affect. Also, Radeon is far from in order with ray tracing. It puts a lot of strain on the system, which is why most games with beams turned on often look unplayable. NVIDIA solves this problem with dedicated tensor cores and DLSS technology. Radeon is developing a free alternative in the form of FSR, but it performs best at low and medium resolutions, which does not make much sense in our situation.
