Canon EOS 5D Mark III kit 17-40
 | Expecting restock 92 270 ₴ Rating: 81; Sensor size: full frame; Effective MP number: 22.3; Focal length: 17 - 40; Optical zoom: 2.35; Manual focus; Image stabilization: is absent; White balance measuring; Auto bracketing; Viewfinder: optical (pentaprism); Continuous shooting (fps): 6; Screen ("): 3.2; 2 card slots |
 |
Close
We recommend products in stockDigital Cameras Canon →
dSLR, lens kits, 33 MP, screen: 3 '', oscillating, touch, ultra HD (4K) video, lens: 7.5 х, focal: 18 - 135 mm, 701 g
Canon EOS 5D Mark III kit 17-40
Panel:full frame, 22.3 MPix
Focal length:17 - 40 mm
Lens aperture:f/4.0
Snapshot size:5760x3840 px
ISO range:100-25600
Burst shooting:6 fps
Screen:3.2 ''
All specifications
Specifications EOS 5D Mark III kit 17-40
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Canon 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Canon.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Canon 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Canon.
Does a full frame make a difference? Is it worth buying a full-frame camera?Do I need to spend money on an expensive full frame or is it better to buy a cropped camera?..
Decoding Canon Camera Series and Model LabelsCurrent Canon camera lines.
Series Canon EOS (SLR)Compare using chart →
dSLR, lens kits, 24 MP, screen: 3 '', oscillating, touch, ultra HD (4K) video, lens: 3 х, focal: 18 - 55 mm, 449 g
dSLR, lens kits, 33 MP, screen: 3 '', oscillating, touch, ultra HD (4K) video, lens: 3 х, focal: 18-55 mm, 701 g
dSLR, lens kits, 2 lenses, 24 MP, screen: 3 '', oscillating, touch, ultra HD (4K) video, 449 g
dSLR, lens kits, 30 MP, screen: 3.2 '', touch, ultra HD (4K) video, lens: 4.3 х, focal: 24 - 105 mm, 1530 g
dSLR, lens kits, 24 MP, screen: 3 '', oscillating, touch, lens: 3 х, focal: 18 - 55 mm, 658 g
2 1 5 46 |
Great car, I recommend it to everyone when the price drops to a reasonable limit Nothing to add.  Profi: just bought Canon EOS 5D Mark III kit 24-105 |
I travel a lot and, basically, I'm what is now called a travel blogger. A camera in my travels is a tool for creating original content, so this camera came in very handy for me. Moisture-resistant body. Body material – magnesium alloy. Full-frame high-sensitivity CMOS sensor with an integrated dust removal system. Highest quality images. Good white balance and low noise levels even at high ISO. ISO values up to 6400 can be confidently used. Prepares for shooting very quickly. Autofocus works fast, precisely, and can be flexibly adjusted for shooting tasks. Shoots in any lighting except complete darkness. Even in full auto mode, the probability of achieving excellent results is about 98%. Continuous shooting at 6 frames/sec (or 3 frames/sec in silent mode). High-quality automated HDR shooting. Now, if desired, there is no more need to fuss with HDR on a PC, the camera does just as well. Good 3.2-inch high-resolution display. Two slots for memory cards with standards CF and SDHC/SDXC. Convenient controls and customizable custom buttons. Quality kit lens. There is no built-in optical stabilizer, so there may be problems when using unstabilized lenses "handheld". The autofocus is slow in LiveView mode. There is no continuous autofocus for video shooting. |
Large full-frame CMOS sensor with high resolution. 22.3 megapixels is really a lot. The captured material looks great. The images are well-detailed and the colors are natural. You can work at high ISO. Up to 3200 there is no color noise at all, and the brightness noise is very moderate. The advantages of a full-frame sensor are obvious. Durable metal body with rubber inserts. The material of the "body" resembles an aluminum-magnesium alloy. The body is large, well-suited for my not-so-small hand. The weight is substantial - 1600g+ (with the 24-105 IS USM lens), which is a downside on one hand, but on the other hand, the heavy body serves as a kind of stabilizer. I should add that the body is well-protected against water splashes. The magical AI SERVO focusing mode, which works even during sequences in burst shooting. The burst shooting itself is also good. The top utility monochrome LCD screen is very useful. Two memory cards. Two are always better than one ))) Capable of shooting high-quality Full HD video at 30 fps. With the aperture wide open, there is a very shallow depth of field. Although this is not a disadvantage, but rather a feature of a full-frame camera. The weight and dimensions are considerable. You can't just take this camera with you on a casual walk. However, for professional use, neither the weight nor the size is a hindrance. |
3 out of 54 user review(s) shown
10 more user review(s)
Profi
21 April 2013, 02:07
Question about Canon EOS 5D Mark III body Где найти тест-сравнение с Sony Alpha SLT-A99
Прошло пол года с момента презентации Sony Alpha SLT-A99. Обе модели находятся в одной ценовой категории. Неужели до сих пор не было проведено подробное тест-стравнение этих девайсов по всем важным характеристикам: функциональным возможностям, "железу", и самое главное, - по тест-фото в JPG и особенно в RAW! Хотелось бы увидеть профессиональный обзор на похожих объективах топовой серии 24-70. Думаю, Alpha выиграет по видео, но проиграет по фото, особенно на высоких ИСО и в RAW. Но нужны факты.
3 out of 7 question(s) shown
4 more question(s)
Video reviews
Additional features digital camera Canon EOS 5D Mark III kit 17-40:
- Remote Control Port
- In total there are 71 settings in 4 groups
- Headphone jack
I used to love the 24-105, then I switched to the 24-70 and now I regret it. For almost a year now, I've been struggling with this issue. I'm seriously considering selling the 24-70 and buying the 24-105 back.
The 24-70 is noticeably heavier, I'm constantly missing the focal lengths, meaning it's not universal enough. Of course, the aperture is a plus, but the 24-105 has stabilization.
Absolutely incompetent post by Nobody. The 24-70 is a head above the 24-105 in almost all characteristics, except for weight. I consider the 280g weight difference non-critical since you have to pay for quality.
1) Lens aperture - this is clear. Night and day.
2) The build quality of the 24-105 is incomparably worse than that of the 24-70. I write this as a repair technician. In 5 years, I've only had the 24-70 in for repair once, and that was after a fall. The 24-105 constantly has issues with ribbon cables. There are other design flaws too.
3) An important nuance: photographing with the 24-70 without a stabilizer gives a better result than with the 24-105 with a stabilizer! Reasonable question: why is it even needed there? We'll leave that to the conscience of Canon developers.
4) The difference between 70 and 105 isn't all that critical. And if you're shooting with a 5D Mark III, you can easily crop the needed scene when printing or using Photoshop. Fortunately, there are plenty of pixels!