Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L EF USM
![]() |
Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L EF USM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
. The Canon EF 70-200mm telephoto lens stands out for its good aperture ratio: in the entire range of focal lengths (70-200) it is 2.8. Designed for Canon systems with Full frame sensors. The minimum aperture value is 32, 8 petals are provided. The autofocus drive is ultrasonic, but image stabilization is not provided.
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Canon 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Canon.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Canon 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Canon.
Buy Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L EF USM
Объектив Canon EF 70-200 mm F/2.8 L USM | 55 000 ₴ | ![]() | |||
Canon EF 70-200 mm F/2.8 L USM | 55 000 ₴ | ![]() | |||
Объектив Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 46 000 ₴ | ![]() |
Model overview based on user reviews
The Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L EF USM lens is praised for its versatility and sharpness, especially on full-frame cameras, with minimal chromatic aberrations and distortion. It offers a constant f/2.8 aperture, providing better bokeh at 70mm and is considered reasonably priced at around 10,500 UAH. However, it lacks image stabilization and is heavier compared to its f/4 counterpart, which some users find to have slightly faster autofocus, a shorter minimum focus distance, and better performance in backlighting. The f/4 version is also lighter and more affordable, making it a preferred choice for those who do not require the wider aperture for low-light conditions. Overall, while the f/2.8 model is excellent for low-light photography, such as concerts, users suggest considering the f/4 version if aperture is not a priority.
Pros
Cons
0 0 3 22 |
An excellent model, but inferior to its cheaper brother 70-200/4, so if you do not need to shoot, for example, concerts in a darker room, I advise you to opt for the four, saving money for something more important. - Versatility, especially on full-frame; - Sharpness at 2.8; - Almost no chromatic aberrations and distortion; - The kit includes a nice case, which can be worn over the shoulder or on the waist; - Provides better bokeh at 70mm due to the 2.8 aperture, compared to its darker counterpart. However, at 200mm, the bokeh at 2.8 and 4 is almost identical; - I consider the price of around 10,500 UAH to be reasonable now. Previously, there was a model with an f/4 aperture and no image stabilization. Switched to 2.8 because the model is more versatile in low-light conditions. However, oddly enough, the cheapest 70-200/4 outperformed the 2.8 model in almost everything except for sheer lens speed. This includes: - Slightly faster and more accurate autofocus; - Minimum shooting distance of 1.2m instead of 1.5m; - Slightly more contrast; - In backlighting, it doesn't catch flares and rainbows, but produces beautiful warm highlights; - Price and weight are half as much. just bought Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L EF USM |
i photograph weddings, boots size 40, I can't decide whether to get f4 or f2.8 without stabilization. Please advise! Thanks in advance image weight ![]() |
2 out of 25 user review(s) shown
10 more user review(s)
22 April 2015, 16:24
Question about Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L EF USM Следите за банерами в интернете лучше!
Запарили уже на банерах крутится одна цена, а переходишь на сайт другая цена, при чём подавно нет и в помине такой!!! Понимаю что можно ошибиться в 1 или 2 тыс руб. но на 30.000 руб.
Жалко нельзя прикрепить скриншот!
Жалко нельзя прикрепить скриншот!
We recommendCompare using chart →