Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11400T OEM (CM8070804497106)
 |
 |
Close
Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11400T OEM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Intel 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Intel.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Intel 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Intel.
Why is the new processor faster at the same frequency?The main factors that make new processes faster without increasing clock speeds
How to choose a CPU?How to choose the right CPU for any task, from spreadsheets to modern games and work applications
Buy Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11400T OEM
Процесор Intel Core i5-11400T (CM8070804497106) CM8070804497106 | 14 085 ₴ |  | |||
| 14 285 ₴ |  | ||||
| 14 068 ₴ |  | ||||
Процесор Intel Core i5-11400T (CM8070804497106) | 14 062 ₴ |  | |||
| 14 065 ₴ |  | ||||
AccessoriesAll accessories for Intel i5-11400T OEM →
0 1 1 11 |
Cost/Performance A powerful tower is needed to deliver potential  VladPod: use Intel i5-11400F BOX less than month |
Took 08.2021, for 6k UAH. At that time it was more profitable than the 3600x, even if you count with the motherboard. After the fufiks, I didn’t want to contact AMD again. Cold with a simple Gammaxx GTE V2. Performance is top-notch; I didn't find any tasks that would justify paying extra for an i7. The platform was more advantageous than Ryzen. Installed and forgot (sounds like a joke, but it's true, over time you want to enjoy the computer, not spend evenings in the BIOS, squeezing a few extra megahertz and running AIDA64). No David Skryabin: use Intel i5-11400F BOX more than year |
Overall, the jokes about plumbing for cooling and high-voltage lines for power turned out to be not quite jokes. A power-hungry, very hot chip. This is exactly the price Intel had to pay to catch up with Zen 3. But even though it's cheaper than the 5600X and doesn’t lag in performance, this difference will be offset by slightly more expensive motherboards and the need for more powerful cooling. The main advantage of this processor is that you can use it until you buy a graphics card, thanks to the integrated graphics, and at the moment, this is a huge plus. For example, if you take the 5600G, it will later bottleneck any discrete card with a limited number of PCIe lanes and cut-down L3 cache - YouTube is full of tests with dismal results. Performance - my old 10400f tears it to shreds, FPS and stability in games have increased significantly. The integrated graphics allow you to finally play something, it handles PoE, Raft, and even Minecraft with a hundred mods (and that's a very resource-demanding beast, trust me), so there's plenty to play. Price - a little lower than the competitor like the 5600x, and if you take the non-K version, the offer is even more attractive. Now, it's not necessary to get a Z-chipset for fast memory; boards on B560 support its overclocking and are reasonably priced. Heating and wild consumption. The Dark Rock 4 Pro barely copes with it, even at stock, holding around 76-82 degrees in AIDA, with brief spikes to nearly 90. It doesn't particularly want to undervolt either, it seems Intel sends pretty tight chips on the lower series. Initially, a DeepCool Gammax EX 400 was installed, and with it, it managed to throttle at stock. Once again - at stock, power limits were set to Intel's. The new memory controller and its gear modes are like those on the tenth generation; you can't just plug in any high-speed stick and enable XMP. Above 3600, there's a high probability you'll have to switch to Gear 2 mode and deal with drops in memory performance, spending long evenings tweaking the timings. All that's left is for someone to release a calculator, and it will be a true Ryzen experience. Although I experienced drops at any frequency and mode until I moved from Z490 (updated BIOS for 11th generation, tried several versions) to Z590 - so much for promised compatibility, although ASRock might have messed something up. Narin Snow: use Intel i5-11600K BOX few months |
3 out of 13 user review(s) shown
10 more user review(s)
3 out of 28 question(s) shown
15 more question(s)
Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake configurations
| Price for Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11400 BOX | from 5 089 ₴ | 60 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11400 OEM | from 4 936 ₴ | 67 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11400F BOX | from 4 431 ₴ | 34 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11400F OEM | from 3 591 ₴ | 48 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11400T OEM | from 14 062 ₴ | 5 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11600 OEM | from 10 550 ₴ | 1 offer | |
| Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11600K BOX | from 19 016 ₴ | 2 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11600KF OEM | from 4 995 ₴ | 2 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11600K OEM | from 6 195 ₴ | 1 offer | |
Video reviews
Intel Core i5-11600K Review, vs. Ryzen 5 5600X & Core i5-10600K
30 March 2021163 998 view
Тест I5-11600K vs i5-10600KF, R5 5600X и i7-10700K
15 April 2021103 274 view
i5-11400F vs. i5-10400F | Test in 8 Games
2 April 2021173 049 view
We recommend
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 4 , threads 8 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 3.9 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 4.1 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent
AMD WRX8, 280 W, cores 12 / 16 , threads 24 / 32 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.9 / 4 GHz, TurboBoost 4.3 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent
AMD AM4, 35 / 65 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.2 - 3.8 GHz, TurboBoost 4.6 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent / Radeon Vega 8
Intel LGA 1151 v2, 35 - 95 W, cores 6 , threads 6 threads, process technology 14 nm, 2.2 - 3.7 GHz, TurboBoost 3.7 - 4.6 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 2666 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 630
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.7 GHz, TurboBoost 4.2 GHz, maximum 64 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, Radeon Vega 7
AMD AM4, 35 / 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.4 - 3.9 GHz, TurboBoost 4.2 - 4.6 GHz, maximum - / 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent - Radeon
Intel LGA 1700, 35 - 125 W, cores 10 / 14 , 6P+4E, 6P+8E, threads 16 / 20 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 4800 / 5600 MHz, is absent - UHD Graphics 770
AMD AM5, 65 - 120 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 5 nm, TurboBoost 5 - 5.4 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR5 5200 MHz, Radeon
Intel LGA 1700, 35 - 150 W, cores 24 , 8P+16E, threads 32 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 5600 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 770
Intel LGA 1700, 35 - 125 W, cores 16 , 8P+8E, threads 24 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 5600 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 770
Intel LGA 1151 v2, 35 - 95 W, cores 6 , threads 6 threads, process technology 14 nm, 1.7 - 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 3.3 - 4.3 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 2666 MHz, UHD Graphics 630
Motherboard with a B560 socket
The processor is very good. But I have a 200W cooler, I unlocked the processor power consumption in the BIOS. At load, it consumes 150-170W.
I recommend buying.