AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3900X OEM (100-000000023)
 | 13 837 ₴ Buy!  Процесор AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 3.8GHz/64M (100-000000023) sAM4, trayMarketplace: Rozetka.ua CS6 year with us (Kyiv) Report |
 |
Close
AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3900X OEM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 Zen 2 multi-threaded cores, 64MB L3 cache. The PCI-E 4.0 controller provides 24 lines of this interface.
The advanced processor of the Ryzen 9 line with the Zen 2 microarchitecture is created using a 7nm process technology. It debuted on the market in 2019 and is positioned as a direct successor to the Ryzen Threadripper AMD 2920X, introduced a year earlier. The high computing potential of the CPU is provided by 12 cores with multitasking support, which allows you to simultaneously execute up to 24 command streams.
The clock frequency in the basic mode of operation is 3.8 GHz, and when the load increases, it can automatically increase to 4.6 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3900X OEM processor features 64MB of L3 cache for faster data access and improved overall system performance. The model is compatible with various socket AM4 motherboards, supports DDR4 3200 MHz "RAM" and does not provide a graphics core. The CPU has a free multiplier and is not equipped with a cooler (105 W heat dissipation), which, with the right choice of cooling system, will provide a good potential for user overclocking.
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog AMD 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models AMD.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog AMD 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models AMD.
Why is the new processor faster at the same frequency?The main factors that make new processes faster without increasing clock speeds
How to choose a CPU?How to choose the right CPU for any task, from spreadsheets to modern games and work applications
Video reviews
Королевские процы по народной цене! Ryzen 3700x и 3900x против 2700x и i7 8700k
7 July 2019151 023 view
Gaming and Productivity Benchmarks - Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 3900X Full Review
7 July 2019139 049 view
Ryzen 3900X & 3700X VS 9900K & 2700X
7 July 201927 568 view
AccessoriesAll accessories for AMD 3900X OEM →
Model overview based on user reviews
The AMD 3900X OEM processor receives high marks for its performance in multi-threaded tasks and gaming, as well as for its good price-to-quality ratio. However, users note high memory requirements and compatibility issues, which can complicate its setup. Overall, this is a powerful processor suitable for serious tasks, but it requires careful attention to system configuration.
Pros
Cons
1 2 1 8 |
Good performance, absolutely everywhere and in everything. For the money that it SHOULD cost, it would have no analogues. But.. 1) The market broke the philosophy of this processor, as it was supposed to cost significantly less than the 3900x while being better (in the right hands), but that didn't happen. In fact, they were either priced the same or the difference was meaningless. These processors are very, very rare, maybe that had an effect.. 2) There are many inexperienced users who manage to "choke" the processor, then go to the comments.. 3) Requires good memory. Good does not mean the most advanced and expensive. Right now, finding reasonably priced dual-rank RAM that can do 3600 cl16 is not a problem at all. Anything that isn't dual-rank noticeably chokes the processor in games because there's a huge L3 cache here, one just needs to organize the data pumping for the processor.. Zen cores are quite fast on their own. 4) Requires a motherboard with a good power supply. Good does not mean you need to buy something uber-expensive and overclocked, just a good one. 5) Worked DISGUSTINGLY on the Crosshair 6 Hero x370, stability was not there. Moving to the B550-A Rog Strix solved all the problems one by one, perfect performance. This relates to the processor only in so far as it's for your information.  Dmitriy Mitus: use AMD 3900 OEM more than year |
I took 2070s, asus tuf gaming x570 and ryzen9 3900x for assembly. If I could return the time, I would most likely take intel. I can’t say that the percent is really bad, it’s just that its advantages are rarely used in my tasks. Multithreading is good for rendering, but for modeling and games it gives very little because these processes are usually one or two threaded and simply run into 1 core. I changed the wraith prism box cooler to a noctua because it is quite noisy and in the tests the percentage gave out 95 degrees right from the threshold. It also didn’t work out adequately to overclock the RAM (kit 16x2 corsair vengeance 3000mhz), the maximum that I got was 3200 by 17. Although reviews, articles, a ryzen calculator, etc. showed completely different indicators. As a result, in RAM latency tests, it shows a value of 75ns (in Intel, this value is two times lower). Even if we assume that very bad dies were caught, then for good ones this value would be in the range of 63-65, which is still a lot. -Relatively small TDP -High RAM latency, actual lock of infinite fabric at 1900mhz -Slow stock cooler -Comparatively poor for single-threaded tasks nikolai tihres: use AMD 3900X BOX more than year |
2 out of 12 user review(s) shown
10 more user review(s)
We recommendCompare using chart →
AMD AM4, cores 12, threads 24, 3.7 GHz, TurboBoost 4.8 GHz, process technology 7 nm, PCI-E 4.0, is absent, unlocked multiplier, multithreading, TDP 105 W, память ОЗУ: DDR4 3200 MHz
AMD AM4, cores 8, threads 16, 3.8 GHz, TurboBoost 4.8 GHz, process technology 7 nm, PCI-E 4.0, is absent, unlocked multiplier, multithreading, TDP 105 W, память ОЗУ: maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz
AMD AM4, cores 4, threads 8, 3.7 GHz, TurboBoost 4.2 GHz, process technology 12 nm, Radeon Vega 11, unlocked multiplier, integrated graphics, multithreading, TDP 65 W, память ОЗУ: DDR4 2933 MHz
AMD AM4, cores 6, threads 12, 3.7 GHz, TurboBoost 4.2 GHz, process technology 7 nm, Radeon Vega 7, integrated graphics, multithreading, TDP 65 W, память ОЗУ: maximum 64 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 4 , threads 8 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 3.9 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 4.1 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent
AMD AM4, 35 / 65 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.2 - 3.8 GHz, TurboBoost 4.6 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent / Radeon Vega 8
Intel LGA 1151 v2, 35 - 95 W, cores 6 , threads 6 threads, process technology 14 nm, 2.2 - 3.7 GHz, TurboBoost 3.7 - 4.6 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 2666 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 630
AMD AM4, 35 / 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.4 - 3.9 GHz, TurboBoost 4.2 - 4.6 GHz, maximum - / 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent - Radeon
Intel LGA 1700, 35 - 125 W, cores 10 / 14 , 6P+4E, 6P+8E, threads 16 / 20 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 4800 / 5600 MHz, is absent - UHD Graphics 770
AMD AM5, 65 - 120 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 5 nm, TurboBoost 5 - 5.4 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR5 5200 MHz, Radeon
Intel LGA 1700, 35 - 150 W, cores 24 , 8P+16E, threads 32 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 5600 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 770
A very cozy little chip. My particular unit undervolted well and allowed some fun with boosting. It could work with 3800 memory, but the Infinity Fabric faltered, refusing to go above 1800, otherwise causing WHEA bus/interconnect errors that couldn't be resolved. It's not a huge loss, everything is quite respectable as it is. Single-core performance (and gaming performance) is on par with 8700K-9900K (keeping in mind that 9900K has a 500MHz higher core clock, and everything becomes clear for those "in the know"). In principle, this processor sits somewhere between the 9900K and 10900. Those who like to talk about high latencies, just open Zen Timings, observe the desynchronization in UCLK/MCLK/FCLK, slap your clumsy hands and delete inaccurate comments. A big hello to those who pair such a chip with single-rank memory - guys, don't build PCs, it's not for you) Buy a pre-built one somewhere like Foxtrot, save yourself and others from trouble). Also, a shoutout to water cooling enthusiasts, I'll let you in on a secret that practically any mid-range air cooler can handle this CPU (I had a Dark Rock 4, but you can go for something cheaper with similar efficiency. My PBO limits were set higher than those of the 3900X).
That overclock on the screenshots were intermediate results, unfortunately, I don't have the final ones at hand right now. I gave the system to a friend, was too reluctant to sell it( As a result, single-threaded performance matched the 3900X level, and multi-threaded performance was even better. Boost on all cores was 4200, and stable 4450 on a single core.