AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3900 PRO OEM (100-000000072)
 |
 |
Close
AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3900 PRO OEM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How to choose a CPU?How to choose the right CPU for any task, from spreadsheets to modern games and work applications
What is CPU throttling, why is it needed and how to deal with itWe deal with the terrible term throttling, while simultaneously solving problems with a slowing down smartphone or laptop
Information in model description is for reference purposes.
Before buying always check characteristics and configuration of product with online store manager
Before buying always check characteristics and configuration of product with online store manager
Buy AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3900 PRO OEM
All prices 9 →Процесор AMD Ryzen 9 3900 PRO (100-000000072) 100-000000072 | 8 201 ₴ |  | |||
| 8 750 ₴ |  | ||||
| 8 750 ₴ |  | ||||
AMD Процесор AMD Ryzen 9 3900 PRO (100-000000072) 100-000000072 | 8 750 ₴ |  | |||
Процесор AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 TRAY (100000000072) | 26 819 ₴ |  | |||
4 more offer(s)
Video reviews
Королевские процы по народной цене! Ryzen 3700x и 3900x против 2700x и i7 8700k
7 July 2019150 802 view
Gaming and Productivity Benchmarks - Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 3900X Full Review
7 July 2019138 722 view
Ryzen 3900X & 3700X VS 9900K & 2700X
7 July 201927 492 view
Asrock b450 steel legend AMD 3900x BOX
14 February 2021483 view
Новый AMD Ryzen 9 3950X Самый быстрый игровой процессор?
15 November 201986 895 view
12 ядерный Мини ПК Ryzen 9 3900 вместо игрового ноутбука. Почему я не стал покупать мощный ноутбук..
23 January 20217 906 view
AccessoriesAll accessories for AMD 3900 PRO OEM →
1 2 1 8 |
Good performance, absolutely everywhere and in everything. For the money that it SHOULD cost, it would have no analogues. But.. 1) The marketplace broke the philosophy of this processor, because it was supposed to cost significantly less than 3900x, and at the same time be better (in the right hands), but this did not happen. In fact, they were either the same, or the difference was meaningless. There are very few of these processes, perhaps this somehow influenced ..
2) A lot of inept users who manage to "strangle" the percent, and then go to the comments .. 3) Requires a good memory. Good does not mean the coolest and most expensive. Finding now for sane money a two-rank opera that can in 3600 cl16 is not a problem at all. Everything that is not two-rank in games very noticeably stifles the percentage, because there is a huge L3 cache, you just need to organize the pumping of the processor with data .. Zen cores are quite smart, by themselves 4) Requires a mother with a good feeder. Good does not mean that you need to take an expensive and overclocker uber, just a good one. 5) DISGUSTINGly worked on Crosshair 6 Hero x370, stability was not included in the chat. Moving to the B550-A Rog Strix solved every single problem, the flight was perfect. This applies to the process insofar as, but just for information  Дмитрий Митус: use AMD 3900 OEM more than year |
I took 2070s, asus tuf gaming x570 and ryzen9 3900x for assembly. If I could return the time, I would most likely take intel. I can’t say that the percent is really bad, it’s just that its advantages are rarely used in my tasks. Multithreading is good for rendering, but for modeling and games it gives very little because these processes are usually one or two threaded and simply run into 1 core. I changed the wraith prism box cooler to a noctua because it is quite noisy and in the tests the percentage gave out 95 degrees right from the threshold. It also didn’t work out adequately to overclock the RAM (kit 16x2 corsair vengeance 3000mhz), the maximum that I got was 3200 by 17. Although reviews, articles, a ryzen calculator, etc. showed completely different indicators. As a result, in RAM latency tests, it shows a value of 75ns (in Intel, this value is two times lower). Even if we assume that very bad dies were caught, then for good ones this value would be in the range of 63-65, which is still a lot. -Number of threads
- At the time of purchase was a little cheaper than competitors - Relatively small tdp -High RAM latency, actual factory loc infinite at 1900mhz
-Weak boxed cooler - Comparatively bad for single-threaded tasks nikolai tihres: use AMD 3900X BOX more than year |
2 out of 12 user review(s) shown
10 more user review(s)
AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse configurations
| Price for AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3900 OEM | from 8 201 ₴ | 4 offers | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3900 PRO OEM | from 8 201 ₴ | 9 offers | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3900X BOX | from 29 148 ₴ | 1 offer | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3900X OEM | from 18 449 ₴ | 6 offers | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3950X BOX | from 19 882 ₴ | 8 offers | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 Matisse 3950X OEM | from 24 110 ₴ | 1 offer | |
We recommendCompare using chart →
AMD AM4, cores 12, threads 24, 3.1 GHz, TurboBoost 4.3 GHz, process technology 7 nm, PCI-E 4.0, is absent, unlocked multiplier, multithreading, TDP 65 W, память ОЗУ: maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz
AMD AM4, cores 8, threads 16, 3 GHz, TurboBoost 4.1 GHz, process technology 7 nm, PCI-E 4.0, is absent, unlocked multiplier, multithreading, TDP 105 W, память ОЗУ: maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz
AMD AM4, cores 8, threads 16, 3.2 GHz, TurboBoost 4.1 GHz, process technology 12 nm, is absent, unlocked multiplier, multithreading, TDP 65 W, память ОЗУ: maximum 64 GB, DDR4 2933 MHz
AMD AM4, cores 8, threads 16, 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 4.4 GHz, process technology 7 nm, Radeon Vega 8, unlocked multiplier, integrated graphics, multithreading, TDP 65 W, память ОЗУ: maximum 64 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz
AMD AM4, cores 8, threads 16, 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 4.4 GHz, process technology 7 nm, PCI-E 4.0, is absent, unlocked multiplier, multithreading, TDP 65 W, память ОЗУ: maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz
AMD AM4, cores 6, threads 12, 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 4.2 GHz, process technology 12 nm, is absent, unlocked multiplier, multithreading, TDP 95 W, память ОЗУ: maximum 64 GB, DDR4 2933 MHz
AMD AM4, cores 8, threads 16, 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 4 GHz, process technology 14 nm, is absent, unlocked multiplier, multithreading, TDP 95 W, память ОЗУ: maximum 64 GB, DDR4 2667 MHz
AMD AM4, cores 4, threads 8, 3.5 GHz, TurboBoost 4 GHz, process technology 7 nm, Radeon Vega 6, integrated graphics, multithreading, TDP 35 W, память ОЗУ: maximum 64 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 4 , threads 8 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.6 / 3.8 GHz, TurboBoost 3.9 / 4.3 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 4.1 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent
Intel LGA 1200, 35 - 125 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 14 nm, 1.4 - 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 4.6 - 5 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent / UHD Graphics 750
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.7 / 3.8 GHz, TurboBoost 4.6 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, is absent / Radeon Vega 8
A very light stone. Specifically, my copy was well downvolted + let me play with the boost. Could work with 3800 memory, but IF let us down, didn’t want to go above 1800, otherwise WHEA bus / interconnect, which could not be overcome. To say that the loss is big will not work, so everything is very worthy. Single-core performance (and performance in games) at the level of 8700K-9900K (keep in mind that 9900K is 500 MHz faster in the cores, and everything immediately becomes clear and understandable. For those who are "in the know", of course)). That and, in principle, this percentage is somewhere between 9900K and 10900. Those who like to write about large delays, open Zen Timings, observe desynchronization in UCLK / MCLK / FCLK, beat ourselves on crooked hands and delete inaccurate comments. A big hello to those who put a peer-to-peer opera to such a process - guys, don’t assemble computers, not yours) Buy it ready somewhere in a foxtrot, don’t torture yourself and others). Also hello to lovers of "water", I'll tell you a secret that almost any medium-low-cost air will cope with this process (I had Dark Rock 4, but something cheaper with similar efficiency is possible. At the same time, my PBO limits were higher than those of 3900s).
The overclocking that on the screenshots was the intermediate results, the final ones, alas, are not at hand now. I gave the system to a friend, it was a pity to sell (As a result, single-threaded performance turned out to be at the level of 3900x, and multi-threaded performance was even better than that. Boost for all cores 4200, stable 4450 per core