Daikin Stylish FTXA50A/RXA50A 50 m²
![]() |
Daikin Stylish FTXA50A/RXA50A 50 m²
Type:split, wall
Recommended area:50 m²
heating T:from -15 °C
Consumption:1360/1450 W, cooling class A++, heating class A++
Functions:night mode, control via smartphone
The infrared sensor divides the room into 64 sectors and controls the temperature in each of them to evenly distribute the air flow
All specifications
Specifications Stylish FTXA50A/RXA50A
|
|
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Daikin 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Daikin.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Daikin 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Daikin.

How to choose an air conditionerThe main criteria to consider when choosing an air conditioner

What is the difference between a cheap air conditioner and an expensive one?Is it worth paying more when buying an air conditioner? Let's take a look at the pros and cons.
Buy Daikin Stylish FTXA50A/RXA50A 50 m²
All prices 30 →Кондиціонер Daikin Stylish FTXA50BB/RXA50B | 141 990 ₴ | ![]() | |||
DAIKIN FTXA50AW/RXA50A | 135 622 ₴ | ![]() | |||
Кондиціонер Daikin FTXA50AW/RXA50B STYLISH | 134 208 ₴ | ![]() | |||
Кондиціонер Daikin FTXA50AT/RXA50A | 79 900 ₴ | ![]() | |||
Спліт-система Daikin FTXA50AW/RXA50B | 129 333 ₴ | ![]() |
20 more offer(s)
Daikin Stylish FTXA50A/RXA50A configurations
Price for Daikin Stylish FTXA50A/RXA50A | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Daikin Stylish FTXA20A/RXA20A 20 m² | from 67 874 ₴ | 8 offers | |
![]() | Daikin Stylish FTXA25A/RXA25A 25 m² | from 71 264 ₴ | 8 offers | |
![]() | Daikin Stylish FTXA35A/RXA35A 34 m² | from 86 337 ₴ | 7 offers | |
![]() | Daikin Stylish FTXA42A/RXA42A 42 m² | from 60 170 ₴ | 30 offers | |
![]() | Daikin Stylish FTXA50A/RXA50A 50 m² | from 79 900 ₴ | 30 offers |
We recommendCompare using chart →