Samsung 870 QVO MZ-77Q8T0 8 TB
 |
 |
Close
Samsung MZ-77Q8T0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intelligent TurboWrite technology allocates a portion of the drive's capacity to act as an SLC cache. For the basic version, the cache volume can reach 42 GB, for the rest — 78 GB.
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Samsung 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Samsung.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Samsung 2025 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Samsung.
TLC, QLC, MLC, SLC: which type of drive memory is better?Important differences between the types of NAND memory TLC, QLC, MLC, SLC, which determine the scope of their use and development prospects
How to choose the right SSD?Choosing an SSD with the required speed and good reliability for home, work and gaming
Buy Samsung 870 QVO MZ-77Q8T0 8 TB
All prices 59 →| 26 909 ₴ |  | ||||
| 26 099 ₴ |  | ||||
| 24 780 ₴ |  | ||||
SSD накопичувач SAMSUNG 870 QVO 8TB 2.5" SATA V5 (9X Layer) QLC (MZ-77Q8T0BW) MZ-77Q8T0BW | 27 363 ₴ |  | |||
| 25 704 ₴ |  | ||||
20 more offer(s)
Series Samsung QVO (low-cost QLC)Compare using chart →
8000 GB, 2.5", 3D QLC NAND, write: 530 MB/s, read: 560 MB/s, SATA 3, DRAM buffer, warranty 3 years
1000 GB, 2.5", 3D QLC NAND, write: 530 MB/s, read: 560 MB/s, SATA 3, DRAM buffer, warranty 3 years
4000 GB, 2.5", 3D QLC NAND, write: 530 MB/s, read: 560 MB/s, SATA 3, DRAM buffer, warranty 3 years
2000 GB, 2.5", 3D QLC NAND, write: 530 MB/s, read: 560 MB/s, SATA 3, DRAM buffer, warranty 3 years
0 3 2 0 |
Швидкість відповідає заявленим характеристикам. Тривалість життя комірок  Max Rockatansky: use Samsung MZ-77Q1T0 more than year |
Надійно працює, швидкість, як і у всіх SATA-SSD, ресурс високий. Повністю задоволений. Високий ресурс Не виявив  Oleksandr Neznayomiy: use Samsung MZ-77Q1T0 more than year |
I give this drive 3 stars. Exactly as long as he worked. And to be more specific, the SSD worked out exactly its warranty period and that’s it, problems began. I bought the drive at the end of December 2020. It is now January 2024. The storage resource has NOT been exhausted (in total, not the full 23 TB out of 360 TB available). The SSD has not been dropped, the power supply is good. It’s just that after 3 years of operation it began to throw errors and because of it the system boots the fifth time. As soon as I disconnect the SSD from the system, everything works fine. The native SAMSUNG Magician utility, after 10 (!) hours of full scanning, is at 0%. The quick scan took 3 hours and found nothing. The firmware cannot be installed through the same utility - it says "error". It’s very sad that SAMSUNG (and this is a brand in the world of storage devices too) exceeded its warranty period and simply began to fail. Sadness is a seal. Now I doubt even the EVO series - there is a 5-year guarantee - if it works for 5 years, the resource will still have a wow, but it will simply stop functioning. Price at the time of purchase. It fulfilled exactly its warranty period and that’s it - it broke down for no reason with a huge re-recording resource remaining. |
3 out of 5 user review(s) shown
2 more user review(s)
19 July 2021, 19:26
Самый дешманский в сегменте ~2ТБ это Самая дорогая фирма Самсунг??? #
Как так вышло, что всегда самые дорогие Самсунги, оказались самыми дешёвими среди 2ТБ+ ?
3 out of 6 question(s) shown
3 more question(s)
Samsung 870 QVO MZ-77Q8T0 configurations
| Price for Samsung 870 QVO MZ-77Q8T0 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung 870 QVO MZ-77Q1T0 1 TB | from 2 988 ₴ | 66 offers | |
| Samsung 870 QVO MZ-77Q2T0 2 TB | from 6 634 ₴ | 63 offers | |
| Samsung 870 QVO MZ-77Q4T0 4 TB | from 13 179 ₴ | 12 offers | |
| Samsung 870 QVO MZ-77Q8T0 8 TB | from 24 780 ₴ | 59 offers | |
We recommend
1000 - 8000 GB, M.2, 22x80, PCI-E 4.0 4x, 3D TLC NAND, 6300 / 6600 MB/s, IOPS 1100 / 1200 K, 7200 / 7300 MB/s, IOPS 800 / 1200 K
128 - 4000 GB, 2.5", 3D TLC NAND, 380 - 520 MB/s, IOPS 70 - 89 K, 530 / 560 MB/s, IOPS 35 - 90 K
1000 - 4000 GB, M.2, 22x80, PCI-E 5.0 2x, 3D TLC NAND, 6300 MB/s, IOPS 1350 / 1400 K, 7150 / 7250 MB/s, IOPS 850 - 1050 K
250 - 4000 GB, M.2, 22x80, PCI-E 4.0 4x, 3D NAND, 1300 - 2700 MB/s, IOPS 300 - 540 K, 3200 / 3500 MB/s, IOPS 110 - 380 K
500 - 4000 GB, M.2, 22x80, PCI-E 4.0 4x, 3D TLC NAND, 4000 - 6400 MB/s, IOPS - / 700 K, 7000 / 7400 MB/s
500 - 4000 GB, M.2, 22x80, PCI-E 4.0 4x, 3D TLC NAND, 3900 - 7000 MB/s, IOPS 900 / 1000 K, 7300 MB/s, IOPS 450 - 1000 K
83% ємності залишилось через 3 роки користування, та 6 Тб запису та перезапису.
Аналогічний носій від Apacer з аналогічною кількістю записів та перезаписів, з тим же терміном служби має 98% ємності, тобто функціонуючих комірок.
Я не буду надто прискіпливим, адже розумію, що знос комірок також може бути через інші фактори. Але наразі в мене є проблеми лише з SSD від Samsung
Проте головне, що поки що цей SSD працює, дякую за це.